The word 'homophobes' doesn't really cover it, because they also exist outside believers in God.
Fundamentalists is too broad to describe it.
"People who condemn homosexuals based on the Bible" is just a too long sentence for a lazy guy like me.
So far I only can think of "Scriptosexuals", but that also doesn't really please me.
Any ideas?
2007-04-23 14:06:46 · 24 answers · asked by ? 6 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
If you can explain me what a 'malakois' is, Kenny P, then you can come back and refer to that same Bible verse.
2007-04-23 14:15:36 · update #1
Stephanie, there is no anger here. I wanna educate them, that's the whole point. Before I can reach them, I first need to address them, so they need a solid label, right? The current labels make no sense to me.
2007-04-23 14:21:53 · update #2
I dunno. Scriptosexuals is pretty good. How about ...
HomoScriptoSexuals or HomoScriptoSexualPhobic.
The only reason anyone would be So concerned about what's going on in other consenting adults pants would be because of INTEREST (latent, blatant or curious).
Markyyy, Are you secretly interested in having sex with Fundes (gender unimportant)? Come on. Don't be ashamed. We've all had thots ... like, "I wonder if they scream "OMG" when orgasming like some regular ppl do? Just come out in the open and admit it. We are here for you brother. It's the first step.
Say it "I am Fundasexual-Curious."
2007-04-23 17:31:05 · answer #1 · answered by ... 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
This is ignorance at its highest! What creative solution shall we use for describing homosexuals and other people who condemn Christians? Lets see how creative we can get.
Christiphobes, Christophobic, Bigots (stands for Barely Intelligent God rejectors On The way to Sheol), Pervosexuals,
Worldlyologists, Hellbounders,Satanservophobes, - you get the idea.
What's good for the goose is good for the gander - or are the anti-Christian crowd a bunch of ne'er do gooders with high standards (double standards that is)?
2007-04-24 08:23:59 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
homophobe?
hmm.. let's skim through Leviticus from uh.. what's that book called again? oh yea, the BIBLE
it's true... the bible specifically says the following:
"You shall not lie with a man as with a woman: that is an abomination." 18:22
okay... i'm fine with that. If that is what your God orders, that is what you should do.
oh and what else does this book say?
"You shall not round off your hair from side to side, and you shall not shave the edge of your beards... you shall not tatoo yourselves." 19:28
and don't forget:
"Of all animals on land these are the creatures you may eat: you may eat any animal which has a parted foot or a cloven hoof ad also chews the cud; those which have only a cloven hoof or only cheew the cud you may not eat." 11:3
does that mean the US should ban people from eating pork and getting tattoos? do all the good christians keep kosher?
oh yea... it also says to sacrifice animals... a lot of animals... do you do that? if you do, someone should call the cops on you
2007-04-23 14:12:45 · answer #3 · answered by blackcat3556 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
could I certainly have searched the Bible for solutions if I wasn't gay? I doubt it. compliment God that He made me gay so i could learn scripture extra heavily. Christ did no longer come into the international to sentence it, it particularly is clean from John 3:17. If Christ would not condemn me for who i'm, as God created me, then why could I subject approximately adult adult males who do? Christ's sacrifice on the bypass replaced into for all -- gay, immediately -- Christian, Jew, and Muslim, Buddhist, regardless of... it particularly is clean from John 3:sixteen.
2016-10-03 11:32:25 · answer #4 · answered by schiraldi 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you don't like being quoted Bible
you are hanging on the wrong board
BTW
Homosexuality is a sin
1st Corinthains 6:9
2007-04-23 14:13:51 · answer #5 · answered by kenny p 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
1 Corinthians 6
9 Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind, 10 Nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God.
Le 18:22 - Show Context
Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination.
Le 20:13 - Show Context
If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.
Eph 5:5 - Show Context
For this ye know, that no whoremonger, nor unclean person, nor covetous man, who is an idolater, hath any inheritance in the kingdom of Christ and of God.
1Co 6:18 - Show Context
Flee fornication. Every sin that a man doeth is without the body; but he that committeth fornication sinneth against his own body.
1Co 6:13 - Show Context
Meats for the belly, and the belly for meats: but God shall destroy both it and them. Now the body is not for fornication, but for the Lord; and the Lord for the body
These are all scriptures from the Bible and god condemns homosexuality because it is not the way that we are designed .
DOm
2007-04-23 14:19:20 · answer #6 · answered by deltadom33 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Those who condemn the practice (not the people) would be called biblically correct in my book. However, God doesn't call us to condemn the individual or judge them unless they say they are of Him.
God calls us not to judge the lost, but to help them; to judge, however, those saying they belong to Him is another matter. But then again, this is to be with much discernment.
2007-04-23 18:57:52 · answer #7 · answered by Charity 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
'Ignorant Hypocrites' sounds just about right. You see, the Biblical verses they prize so dearly deny the very ideal which they aim for-- An All-Loving God.
God would be illogical to create homosexuals if He hated them already.
The pen-holders of the Bible were ALL male(Except maybe Ruth) and as such imposed their own opinion in these verses.
If anyone who reads this is having a heart-attack, then make it quick, because the rest of the world won't wait up on hate...
Peace be upon you...
2007-04-23 14:12:47 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
Yes. The proper term is "bible believing Christians".
2007-04-23 14:31:24 · answer #9 · answered by Esther 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
How do "Biblicus Homophobus" and "Intolerantus Christianus" sound? Or you could always go with "Righteous Bigots." Or maybe even "Damned Judgemental Bastards (DJB's)," since there is nothing in the bible preventing them from judging others and praying for forgiveness, while judging others. Or perhaps "Biblically Intolerant God Ordained Tyrant Sheepherders", or B.I.G.O.T.S., for short.
2007-04-23 14:38:51 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋