Does the saying, "Don't believe everything you read," not apply to sacred texts?

Answer 1

It was specifically coined for sacred texts, Dude!

Answer 2

Some that are written in the Bible are metaphors, some are directly to be understood as is and some needs a deeper understanding in order to be acceptable as true. There is nothing bad for applying the same instruction to the sacred texts. Even the best of teachers in any sacred texts is still human to be considered as infallible. While the Pope is believed to be infallible, there are many times that his papal decree can be rendered no longer applicable in the course of time. Like the the case of the "Limbo" which was just recently taken out. You have your mind that gives you the right to question everyhting you have a doubt to clear it. Oftentimes we interpret the works of a writer quite different from what he intends to say. So, it is not bad not to believe but just do not do it for the sake of not believing. Believe because that is just how you feel.

Answer 3

It most certainly does. The modern day bible has been reshaped, reworded and more or less rewritten so many times that id be very surprised to find that there's more then a few lines that didn't get revamped or blatantly made up during the early middle ages and Renaissance period. Plus faith is more or less based on what the masses want to believe. For example, its widely accepted that angels exist and fly about using their wings...however in the King James version of the bible (which i believe is one of the most popular versions) there is never once a reference made to an angel actually having wings, for all you know they slid down on fire poles and then were teleported back up star trek style. Plus there's the countless texts that didn't make it in to the final version of the bible. (my favorite is the one where it is proclaimed that since god is so infinitely forgiving he's going to let everyone into heaven no matter what they did) now obviously the people in charge aren't going to let that one in since it would defeat most of the purpose of religion (denying yourself the basic pleasures of being alive). Anyways what I'm trying to say is, if you insist on believing in a Deity you should keep an open mind and not confine yourself to literal interpretations of some texts that can't even be conclusively validated.

Answer 4

Newsflash..there is not any such factor as a divinely inspired e book. have you ever actual examine any of them? The Bible, as an occasion, is riddled with contradictions, killing, slavery, misogyny, genocide, merely to call some. humorous sufficient, the circumference of a circle is observed as merely "3," at a time while the Egyptians had already figured it out to a number of places. In different words, you're able to think of that a divinely inspired e book does no longer comprise erroneous information. further, it extremely is been shown via biblical scholars that no longer purely replaced into it written some years after those activities supposedly occurred (a minimum of the hot testomony), yet many thoughts have been merely made up. the tale of Jesus and the prostitute while he says, "permit he who's without sin forged the 1st stone" replaced into further years later (examine "Misquoting Jesus" via Bart Ehrman for extra). human beings might desire to awaken and comprehend that faith is guy made. the only reason it extremely is nonetheless around because of the fact human beings concern dying. no one is acquainted with if there's a god, yet via the seems of it (each and every of the evil interior the international), opportunities are high, there is not any longer. delight in existence mutually as you may!

Answer 5

I think it definitely applies to sacred texts. I look at books about spirituality (i.e. sacred texts) as collections of ideas and philosophy. Nothing more.

Answer 6

I don't believe that was the original intent of that saying.

I also don't believe that, that is the entire statement either.

"Don't believe everything you read in the papers." Is a movie line used when someone gives the press a slip, like reporting someone is dead when they at your door step with a gun pointing at you. You would say the papers said you were dead. and you would say don't believe everything you read in the papers.

Apply it anyway you like but don't mistake it for ancient wisdom passed down to prevent later generations from falling pray to the religious conspiracy's.

Answer 7

Well if you do the research, you'll find that biblical time words can have multiple meanings. I'd say the closest bible-to-meaning is the King James Version (note not the New King James Version)

Answer 8

I would say anyone who claims their text is sacred is almost certainly holding something not worthy of belief.

Answer 9

Now which should I believe............random sayings or sacred texts?

Answer 10

Holy texts should be the first thing that is applied to!