Instead of fighting "the system" could it be studied and modeled accurately and fully known?

Question

by those minds capible of understanding it in order to make it resolve those global problems of greatest magnitude truly perfectly without bringing harm to anyone anywhere in anyway? It seems to me the worse the system works the more people end up suffering dieing or coming to some form of harm and that could be a gauge to study it's perfection steadily increasing it by steadily decreasing that suffering death or harm until there is none being that since there is a finite number of people suffering dieing and being harmed by a finite number of things in the world and those things can be ranked for the order of there magnitude those things with the highest magnitude can be resolved bringing aliviation to the greatest number of people. It would of course have to be modeled down to the smallest detail, though the biggest details would naturally be the first included in the calculation and every single part of it would need to be accurate detecting and correcting errors in real time.

of course it would have to not actually effect any changes in the world without human oversite though the effects of human error would of course need to be taken into it's consideration and prevented before they cause any problems. Could this be used to best determine how to solve all problems that exsist on this world as quickly as possible in a way that causes the absolute least amount of harm possible eventually resulting in a world were no one comes to harm at all in any form whatsoever?

Answer 1

Not everything is controllable, nor observable, nor identifiable. If you did have such a model for the "system", then do you postulate that it is stable or unstable? If unstable, you probably have an ever-expanding universe, if stable, then it is either conditionally stable, or we are headed for the big crunch (no clue of what I'm talking? Read Hawking's essays on the fate of the universe). Where would the energy come from for an ever-expansion? Even if you postulate a conditionally stable system, you have energy exchanges from different components of the system, meaning there is suffering in one place and growth in another. If it is the crunch, then everything is doomed. So forget about being able to solve every problem there is. It is more realistic that you can model "isolated" subsystems and control them to whatver eis your notion of "least harm/suffering".

Answer 2

If a casino was to gaurentee a win or your
money back.
How long do you think it would stay in business?

Answer 3

What is "the system"?

Answer 4

DREAM ON