So If you really Believe the Dems want us to lose in Iraq, Then why are we fighting Iraqis?

Question

I mean by so many right wing conservatives here on Yahoo's logic. Shouldn't we be killing anyone in the U.S. who is liberal, why go to Iraq when you really feel the real enemy is here?
Did your dummy king invade the wrong people again?

B Kiver, you are correct, it is a good question, noted by the the amount of response you put into it, thanks.
To the contrary , you are basically, playing politics with these soldiers' lives. You are trying to prove some lost point that at best will always at most be proven to only 40-50 percent of the country. Like so many Republicans you lack the stomach to follow your real convictions and you have a royal flush of excuse as to why.

Answer 1

Our troops don't police iraq very well, maybe it's because thats not what they're trained to do. When 6 out of 10 iraqi's support attacks on coalition troops, how can we win the peace? we already won the war in iraq, it's time to say goodbye.

Answer 2

That's a good question (well, not really, but it raises an interesting one). The lib/Dem strategy is clear: they see the real enemy as the neo-con/Reps, so engineering a military defeat in order to sieze power from them makes perfect sense. It's more important to save the country from George Bush II than to save it from islamist terrorists who may not even have really attacked us at all (see 9/11 truth).

But what are the neo-con Republicans thinking? Assume that they do recognize the liberal democrats as the 'real enemy.' They can't just start slaughtering them, even if it would be for the good of the country - liberal hysteria aside, this still isn't Nazi Germany. So, what can they do? They have to win the war in Iraq, or they have to find a way to turn defeat there into a democrat failure, rather than a rep failure.

So, pointing at the left and saying: "they want us to lose in Iraq." Also makes sense, it's just another political tactic. That it may, in a sense, be true doesn't make it any less so.

Answer 3

This Dem didn't want to be in Iraq in the first place. But since we are there, we must do everything we can to wean the Iraqis off of our forces. They cannot depend on us indefinitely. I would prefer to bring the troops home from this unjustified war but we must not walk. Not because its a terrorist trainging ground and we're next, oh no we need to stay because we screwed up and its the only right thing to do.

Answer 4

Conservative are okay w/ debates. It when people start spouting at the mouth (keyboard) that we get ticked.

Learn to form a sentence. Then work on a logical debate. After all that, we'll talk.

See you in 4-6 years.

*****************
Asker, war always plays politics w/ soldiers' lives. We know that going in. Your question has no point, & it certaintly does not present anything new. Make your next attempt a better one.

Answer 5

Because Democrats have the Power & The Freedom to support our enemies if they want to.
And the Democrats want to support the insurgents and the terrorists.
They will be rewarded with campaign money next election.

Answer 6

If you are a sample of the average liberal, there would be no need to kill them. They will die of stupidity. Any bullets expended would be a waste of energy. Think conservation and pollution control. Is burning cordite an atmospheric pollutant?

While your suggestion has merit, it is ecologically unsound.

Answer 7

Or, if so many neocons are so good at talking tough, why all the anxiety about fighting them over here? All our beautiful guns are over here right? I would think the neocons would be eager to use theirs.

Answer 8

The dems are terrorists.