Raëlism is a naturalist[1] UFO religion promoted by the Raëlian Movement, which was founded by former auto racing journalist Claude Vorhilon. Followers, the Raëlians, believe in the rights of individualism, sexual self-determination, distributive economy, and accountability, claiming that this will be fostered by greater intelligences and will bring a new age of wealth and peace, as predicted by the main religions.[2]
In December 26, 2002, Brigitte Boisselier, a Raëlian Bishop and CEO of a biotechnology company called Clonaid, announced the birth of baby Eve, a human clone, which at that point ignited much media attention, ethical debate, doubt, critics, and claims of a hoax. Spokespeople for the movement, such as Claude Vorhilon, have suggested that this is only first step in achieving a more important agenda, saying that that accelerated growth process and mind transfer, in combination with cloning are mechanisms by which eternal life may be achieved. Raëlians believe that cloning will serve as the basis for a resurrection of the dead from previous human generations into an intelligently governed paradise which they believe will be created on Earth after the technological singularity[3][4] and the coming of Elohim as well as the prophets of the main religions.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raelians
2007-04-23 10:18:16
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
dying--for somebody stricken by an incurable ailment, working example--could be a launch. it must be a launch for distinctive motives, yet it particularly is one. So, if dying is going to be an evil, you won't be able to say this is undesirable because of the fact this is the tip of life, because of the fact some life is often suffering. rather, you could ought to recent something like this: dying deprives us of exhilaration, happiness, understanding, etc. and you could ought to illustrate the best factors of those issues that lead to dying. in case you have been going to be extremely pessimistic and nihilistic, you ought to argue that exhilaration is an evil insofar because it reminds us how unhappy joyless situations are, and subsequently dying could be a launch from the suffering led to by making use of exhilaration. after all, the speaker is in all probability arguing that dying isn't all undesirable because of the fact this is an end to lots of the hardships of life. of direction, there is the hardship of the which potential of this launch if there is not any afterlife. because of the fact escaping into nothingness or non-being is a doubtful escape if there is not any "I" left to get exhilaration from it. Then, you ought to argue the virtues and flaws of identity etc. this is all i've got have been given.
2016-10-03 11:15:16
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, if you ever wanted to rile the Intelligent Design people, put aliens on equal footing with their deity.
Although frankly I'd believe in super intelligent aliens who messed with our uneducated tribal heads before I'd believe in a deity.
2007-04-23 10:19:26
·
answer #3
·
answered by KC 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Oh JoAnna, aren't they the people who believe some sort of space ship is coming to take them away? If so, can they take the Meathead along with them?
2007-04-23 10:15:33
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
There ARE no positive features.
Apart from the opportunity for a laff, that is
CD
2007-04-23 10:16:43
·
answer #5
·
answered by Super Atheist 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is sufficient to say that the concept is nonsense, and let it go at that.
2007-04-23 10:26:30
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋