English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

That Michaelangelo was gay?

I mean, can you imagine what the Sistine Chapel would look like if a straight dude had painted it?

2007-04-23 04:58:46 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

15 answers

Well, I imagine that the colors would totally clash. And the angels would somehow seem drab. If that straight artist was to rough with his strokes, he might have peeled the material right off the wall!

And by the way, King James was Gay too. If you ever get a chance, read God's Secretaries.

Did you notice that the righteous Bible belt loves the King James Version, but is against anything Gay? They think that Gays are doomed to hell simply for being that way?

This Christian loves the King James Version. I have learned most of what I know using that version. I just wonder how long it will take for the Bible Belt to realize that a Gay person was responsible for bringing to them the most used Bible in history, and replaced the the so called 'Great Bible' with something that was funded by a Gay man?

2007-04-23 05:17:04 · answer #1 · answered by Christian Sinner 7 · 4 0

I've often wonder that myself and how about that gay teacher he had. Imagine life without Leonardo! Even though they ended up hating each other I don't think Rome would be the place it is without either of them. Can you picture the Sistine Chapel done in wallpaper....lol!

2007-04-23 12:04:14 · answer #2 · answered by St. Tom Cruise 4 · 3 0

I suppose they hate the sin, but love the brushwork.

"We thank God for the many gifts and talents he has bestowed upon mankind. We do not thank God when men fall into terrible sins, that will take their souls to hell."

And, of course, homosexuality is a "terrible sin" based on a few cherry-picked texts from among literally hundreds in Scripture that brainless hypocritical bigots like "Eartha Q" daily disregard.

2007-04-23 12:06:35 · answer #3 · answered by jonjon418 6 · 1 0

It's not wrong to imply that gays are more creative, but this creativity probably comes to us as a result of being forced all our lives to copes with clunky straight people in a tasteless world. Consequently, we are forced to think outside the box from birth, and we get an edge on being creative, it's true.

Straight people can learn to be creative, if they stop being cruel, and stop taking themselves so seriously all the time.

2007-04-23 14:11:02 · answer #4 · answered by Kedar 7 · 2 0

And What, exactly, is Wrong with three coats of beige interior?
It's the one with Teflon, so marks wipe off easier.
You're just never happy are you?

:)

2007-04-23 12:09:51 · answer #5 · answered by Orac 4 · 1 0

And can you imagine what heaven would be like, if gays were not allowed in....

No decor
No dance music
Everyone would have terrible hair.

2007-04-23 14:51:45 · answer #6 · answered by G.C. 5 · 1 0

You're telling me, buddy. Only a guy light on his feet could have come up with something like that.

2007-04-23 12:03:15 · answer #7 · answered by NONAME 7 · 2 0

I don't thank God for that reasons - just that he was an outstanding painter!@~

2007-04-23 12:16:09 · answer #8 · answered by nswblue 6 · 0 0

Yeah cos only homosexual people have talent. Well deducted

2007-04-23 12:01:41 · answer #9 · answered by sonfai81 5 · 1 1

We thank God for the many gifts and talents he has bestowed upon mankind.
We do not thank God when men fall into terrible sins, that will take their souls to hell.

2007-04-23 12:03:47 · answer #10 · answered by Eartha Q 6 · 0 7

fedest.com, questions and answers