According to her contract, Cheryl Crow has a HUGE carbon footprint. http://www.thesmokinggun.com/backstagetour/scrow/scrow1.html. In this age of global warming, can we afford to have rock stars wasting this much and using this much fossil fuel?
2007-04-23 04:04:01 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Environment
You should all be aware that she wants to limit toilet paper use to one sheet (or at most 2 or 3 during difficult occasions....) - that's one to three "squares".
However, she makes sure she has plenty of luxuries on her tour.....
2007-04-23 04:23:44 · update #1
Rock and Roll tours shouldn't be stopped. Jeez, we won't be allowed any fun at this rate! Just stop artists like Cheryl Crow using tours to go on about this.
2007-04-23 04:09:31 · answer #1 · answered by the cheshire cat 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Any little thing impacts global warming. The question is how much? I don't care how big their carbon footprint is, rock tours have an insignificantly small footprint compared to the world economy. Stopping the tour would be like paying off one dollar of the national debt.
2007-04-23 04:08:42 · answer #2 · answered by campbelp2002 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Apparently she is still have a problem with global warming since that sounds like a bunch of hot air. If you go on this philosophy, politicians should also be stopped. Good question!!!
2007-04-23 04:09:49 · answer #3 · answered by roritr2005 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
they can afford it. why should they care? why do people pay $50+ for tickets? i don't. i listen to the album at the volume i want and i'm a happy camper.
2007-04-23 04:08:40 · answer #4 · answered by minstrelboy 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
not at all
2007-04-23 04:12:15 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋