When people question atheists and evolution?

Question

Is it possible that they could do it with their own original thoughts instead of copying and pasting from various religious websites? Because I swear that every time there is a question on here challenging atheism or evolution, I can google phrases from those questions and find the website they derived from. Don't you have any ideas of your own?

Answer 1

Same could be said for atheists and evolutionists. Check how many websites are quoted when arguing against belief and the Bible, you will find the exact same thing going the other way. I've done that, and have found the same thing.

As for proving evolution and the like, websites are used to prove it, so if you are allowed to use them to prove it, and not have to come up with your own ideas, then what is wrong with using other websites to disprove?

As far as original ideas, it is 2007, most original ideas that are at all credible have been argued at least once in the course of history, so for anyone to come up with a truly original idea that is at all logical or credible would be a true miracle.

Just understand when you ask a question such as this, that the argument goes both ways, most people here who tout atheism or evolution use 3rd party sources in the same way as those who tout theism and creation.

Answer 2

hrm, flaw for your query >>> Most who responded, their solutions weren't even their possess ideas, Maybe from books???? >>> Yes the strategies ARE headquartered upon anything that any person has confirmed and so they had been learn out of books. What is any person simply meant to sit down down and say "that is evolution" and simply wish it's the right reply? The factor of technological know-how is to invest what if, scan the inspiration, and both turn out yay or nay to that inspiration. And sure the ones strategies WERE recorded in books, it is known as historical past, and it is well to write down down... After the entire bible is an interpretation of a tale that any person a LONG time in the past wrote down.... so you may also now not purchase the truth that a few men and women will learn a technological know-how e-book, and "get it" and "purchase" the strategies within the e-book and so forth.. however that's wherein perception techniques come from, study and strategies of different men and women which can be both confirmed or improved upon. (Even your bible is headquartered upon that). The principal factor although is that scientists dont simply say "that is proper and the whole thing else is improper" nevertheless Religion does, and since there are a couple of a thousand "religions" on this planet (one in all that is known as scientology) they are not able to all be proper, so how are you able to be certain Christianity is the proper one in the event you dont query it?

Answer 3

That would be a huge NO. Mainly due to the fact that most of these guys have spent years and years blindly following what they are told is true because an ancient book told them so.

That should prove that most cant think for themselves.

Also you have to really KNOW about something, actually just a little about something in order to question it. And since most christians REFUSE to even learn about any of the two mentioned topics......they google. Apparently anyone can become "smart" by googling the information. And I guess christians think they are going to go to hell or lose favor from their sky daddy if they learn about evolution.

Answer 4

Lol yes! They all ask us to prove evolution "beyond kind" but it is like pulling teeth to get them to say what they mean by "kind". In my personal experience, two, TWO, 2 of them, actually defined kind, and they were inconsistent with each other.

Occasionally they use arguments that use big words, but it's usually the same big words, as if there's only one creationist that actually creates original arguments and the rest just follow.

And then there's "10 questions for evolutionists", I swear, of a Theists asks where the space for the universe came from AFTER asking where matter comes from, I'll suck his dick.

Answer 5

Yes people have ideas of their own BUT most people are smart enough to know that smarter people have tackled this question. The major requirement of being dumb is not knowing your dumb.

For instance I would prefer to let you know that Einstein once said ""Science without religion is lame. Religion without science is blind." Now I could ramble off a personal explanation 10 paragraphs long but Einstein also said ""Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler."

Answer 6

Actually I think of all my own questions. Its very difficult to ask a question that has never been asked before. I am willing to bet another Atheist even ask this exact question if I looked hard enough. Besides Atheist are not answering the questions anyhow, they will either attack your personality or make up some stupid answer they got from an online website. They're also known for attacking the grammar or something stupid just to avoid the question.

Answer 7

What exactly are you trying to say, that Christian people are not smart enough to have there own ideas? Here we go again with the Christians are dumb and atheist are the top species of smartness. If it makes you feel better. Many Christan's can quote scripture from memory. Can you quote Darwin from memory?And that was my own origanal idea(thought). Won't find that on any website.

Answer 8

What more can you expect? They hope that by repeating the lies of Christianity and creationism someone somewhere might be gullible enough to believe them.

If you will believe in a zombie that was really a god you will believe in almost anything.

Answer 9

Nope. They email me wanting to debate every once in a while. I refuse to answer any direct copy and paste and they are lost. All they have to do is put in in their own words and they can't handle it.

Answer 10

Did you copy and paste that question?
It runs word-for-word parallel to a question I've seen Many times before.
Of course, the word Christian has been substituted by atheist.

Nothing like originality.