English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

How feasible would it be for the goverment in power to place its own people in the electoral offices and stifle dissent?

2007-04-22 23:43:23 · 13 answers · asked by pete the pirate 5 in Politics & Government Elections

13 answers

Not very likely. You're being a bit overdramatic.

2007-04-22 23:46:13 · answer #1 · answered by TheOrange Evil 7 · 2 2

How do you restoration an election? it extremely is all approximately vote counting. You adult males might desire to count variety votes the previous fasioned way. A pollwith 2 names and additionally you're taking a pencil and X the guy you want. that would do away with all your vote casting irregularities which take place each and every time. State via state regulations to choose a president of the entire usa isn't smart. hire Elections Canada. we are going to come down there and throw out all your stupid vote casting machines, permit volunteers do the counting with social gathering officers supervising with hands OFF the pollbox please.

2016-10-28 18:11:37 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

They've fixed 2 presidential elections straight, though maybe it was actually a good thing (Al Gore or John Kerry would have been awful as president, probably worse than Bush).

We should demand that voting machines be deactivated and that they use paper ballots. Without a paper trail, it is impossible to deal with election fraud.

The only reason to use automatic voting machines is if we were voting every week instead of just once or twice a year.

The best way to ensure a fair election is to volunteer to run the voting precinct. If members of each party were present at all precincts, maybe we could cut the risk of election fraud.

They have used dirty tricks in the past, such as jamming party phone lines or telling voters that their polling place had been changed to somewhere across the state. Everybody needs to make sure to go to their regular precinct first before believing any claims. It is also important to make sure you don't get put on any fake felon lists.

Unless you are proactive enough to deal with election fraud (which is commonplace amongst both Republicans and Democrats, though probably nonexistent among minor parties), you are at risk of being denied the right to vote by somebody from the government.

2007-04-23 00:02:32 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

If It hasn't been done already?

WHy would it just START in 2008?
It would have been easier earlier, there has been 43 U.S. Presidents, and you think a fixed election is going to START in 2008.

NO BOTH, Democrat and Republicans are both sell-outs to human causes, The Corporations have paid them well.

If fixed, then it's fixed from both sides making it EQUAL

F*ck political parties, It's time to vote just based on CAUSES/ CONCERNS that are most important.

2007-04-23 00:17:28 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

I'm more afraid we'll have a debacle like we did in 2000 in Florida and then again in 2004 in Ohio, both pivotal states that ended up giving election victories to George Bush. Those were some sad, sad days and it hasn't gotten any better in the last 6 years.......................

2007-04-23 08:03:54 · answer #5 · answered by JoJo 4 · 0 1

Show, with concrete proofs, which american elections are not fixed and i will be concerned about the next elections. Damned democracy!

2007-04-26 20:07:06 · answer #6 · answered by basher 1 · 0 0

I'm not at all concerned. But then again.....Hillary is running for office, so anything is possible and the Dems are extremely desperate.

2007-04-23 00:36:39 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Is this an early attempt to make excuses for when the dems lose in 2008?

2007-04-23 00:21:10 · answer #8 · answered by ? 4 · 2 1

its real simple. have the liberals run hllary against ANYONE in the republican party...when she loses you know it isnt. most sane sober people dont want eight more years of the clinton legacy

- The only president ever impeached on grounds of personal malfeasance
- Most number of convictions and guilty pleas by friends and associates*
- Most number of cabinet officials to come under criminal investigation
- Most number of witnesses to flee country or refuse to testify
- Most number of witnesses to die suddenly
- First president sued for sexual harassment.
- First president accused of rape.
- First first lady to come under criminal investigation
- Largest criminal plea agreement in an illegal campaign contribution case
- First president to establish a legal defense fund.
- First president to be held in contempt of court
- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions
- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions from abroad
- First president disbarred from the US Supreme Court and a state court
other than that, if a liberal wins you might in fact have cause to worry, as it might be fixed.

2007-04-22 23:59:55 · answer #9 · answered by koalatcomics 7 · 2 2

It worked twice before, why would they not try again?

2007-04-22 23:52:21 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2 3

fedest.com, questions and answers