Developed countries and protection laws on less developed countries.?

Question

Do you think developed countries have a right to enforce environment protection laws in less developed countries?
Don't just say yes or no, be detailed.

Answer 1

no...but it is an ecosystem...

Answer 2

Yes, but it has to be fair. Developed nation actually use Environmental concerns to hold down the development of other country. Some country want a freeze of CO2 emmision. WEll, most of the Co2 emmision comes from developed country. That means developing country can not build factories. Europe and the US will hold its advantage over the rest of the world. If you look at China the second largest CO2 emmiter and the US, the largest. China is still emitting at around CO2 neutral per person. They should be the bigest emmiter because it is the most populous nation. Whats more it is reducing its population, so its not using its numbers as muscle.

Answer 3

Until the US (and its allies) signs the Kyoto Protocol, developed countries imposing environmental protection laws in developing countries is nothing but outright hypocrisy. The biggest pollutants in the world are the most developed countries. As sovereign states working in a global community, we all have the responsibility to take care of the environment, thus even poor nations have their own versions of sustainable development programs. Like free trade, its hard for developing nations to swallow what the rich countries are preaching since they themselves are the reoffenders (see debate on agricultural subsidies in WTO).

Answer 4

Actually speaking its not reasonable. May be they can suggest and give ideas for the betterment of their country and hold a bilateral or trilateral discussion. Ordering a country to do something will be like making them a sort of slave to the developed countries. So the developed countries should not enforce them.

Answer 5

Developed countries cannot impose protection of environment laws on poor countries but they could impose it as a bargaining tool in trade agreements or giving of aid.

Answer 6

In a captivating international human beings could basically needless to say get alongside and you does no longer ought to hardship approximately risk-free practices and debt yet in a libertarian international issues could be slightly greater beneficial to a pair degree even if this is particularly subjective. What could sound like an suited dreamland to you and that i feels like the main terrible concern available in somebody else's view. because we are nonetheless living in a imperfect society there could nonetheless be corruption in some form or vogue and to no longer point out the reality that i'm helpful countries could nonetheless hit upon a reason to interrupt off from the main Libertarian team to form their very own version of the Libertarian philosophy. the clarification i've got faith it is via what number those that are prejudiced against one team or yet another. look on the KKK case in point. you think of they're going to elect to be aside of the comparable form of Libertarian philosophy as blacks, Jews, and gays? no longer likely so as that they are going to ruin off and sweetness their very own rules and their very own ideals on how issues ought to be dealt with, etc. i think of this is basically a ingredient of existence to come again right here to overview and to conflict negativity and lack of understanding of all types.