alrgiht, this crazy thing just kinda poped into my mind, and i'm not going to talk to much about it tonight (i'm rally sleepy, but will repost with more solid proof and details in the next day or so) but, when jesus "changes" his diciples name (i think from john to peter) it is in the EXACT same context of the biblical transaltion of wedding vows of the time, when a woman would change her name (yes, her FIRST name) when she married a man.... he is preforming THE FIRST RECORDED GAY WEDDING... i don't have enegy to get sold proof or details tonight, but trust me, look into it and you WILL be suprised (if any really deep, bible-scholars would like to help me look into this idea, please let me know!!!)
2007-04-22 19:35:31 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Cultures & Groups ➔ Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender
call me wrong as much as you want, in a few days, you'll see.... YOU'LL ALL SEE!!!!
2007-04-22 19:41:48 · update #1
Interesting... I've also found proof in the bible that turns the tables on anti-gay beliefs. I'm too tired to put them down, but keep me on your contacts. I want to discuss this further and in more detail.
2007-04-22 19:59:09 · answer #1 · answered by shadedtint 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Sid, Peter was already married -- to a woman. Jesus gave him the new name because it meant "rock" in Hebrew or Aramaic -- Peter was very stubborn and fiesty, and usually stood his ground like a rock -- and Jesus needed someone like that to be a leader in his movement.
Giving someone a new name is not unusual in the Bible. Even in the future resurrection, it is said that everyone will be given a new name.
We know from the Bible that Peter was married because the Bible mentions his mother-in-law. Other church sources mention his wife as well as his daughter. Several, if not many of the apostles were married.
2007-04-22 20:47:20 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
some might want to easily manage one pentacle , others 2 and some 5 . even in spite of the truth that the myth of the abilities discloses a slothful and wicked one-coiner , many who might want to easily manage one coin might want to get saved . Pentacles contained in the Tarot correspond to relationship . A one-coiner can in basic terms ' get it ' on his or her habit being valid . A 2 coiner can practice both funds on the marriage relationship . Such 2 coiners are not saved straight away they ought to ' commerce ' relative to Atonement and relationship effectively . Such then benefit to their sins ' paid for ' . someone whose skills allowed it would want to narrate to the concept of Politics , establishments , or perhaps the kinfolk , for sure their fulfillment also isn't computerized they ought to ' commerce ' with a view in the route of Atonement and an better sphere of relationship . a political candidate for example has the capacity to narrate to the nationwide genealogy . obviously any flesh presser isn't straight away noble so , quite a few them even in spite of the truth that having 5 pentacles might want to fail to have their sins paid for . The Pentacles are an eternal continuum component Jesus makes use of to pay for peoples sins with . The bankers are an Antichrist component Jesus has the right to get again his Pentacle from , the interest is the single coiner saved . One coiners can locate eternal the Aristocracy yet to avert sloth and appropriate wickedness must trust in a very straightforward and sq. Godhead and act in accord with that perception .
2016-10-18 03:13:53 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Don't be silly - the bible is a translation of several translations, therefore unless you have read the actual texts (which even then would be of dubious authenticity) you have no 'proof' of this. However you do make a valid point - the bible can be open to alot of varying interpretations1
2007-04-22 19:40:49 · answer #4 · answered by waggy 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
A little skeptical here, but will wait for more information before I cast my vote.
2007-04-22 19:40:08 · answer #5 · answered by Reece 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I think you're really reaching but I like your way of thinking.
2007-04-22 19:38:54 · answer #6 · answered by thezaylady 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes, I think you are very tired and possibly not seeing very well also.
2007-04-22 19:39:38 · answer #7 · answered by clbinmo 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I think that might be wishful thinking on your part.
2007-04-22 19:39:14 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
um...changing a name isn't marriage...yeah might want to think that out a ittle more
2007-04-22 19:38:36 · answer #9 · answered by who wants to know? 2 · 1⤊ 4⤋