and put her children in danger by allowing Michael Jackson to buy, er, I mean adopt them?
2007-04-22 17:20:54 · 4 answers · asked by I am gorgeous and Jacko is ugly 2 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Celebrities
I 100% honestly do not think she is their biological mother - I believe she was pregnant but she didn't use her own eggs (and Michael is 100% not the biological father of those kids either!).
It just does not make sense to me that she would take a cash settlement if she was the biological mom - she'd have more support, get more cash, and never have to worry about anything if she had taken the kids with her.
2007-04-22 17:53:43 · answer #1 · answered by Avalon 4 · 5⤊ 1⤋
Yes she is.But in her defense,she obviously is not playing with a full deck of cards.
2007-04-23 10:49:21 · answer #2 · answered by Candi Apples 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
They're his kids too, he has a right to them and he's a great father!!
â¥â¥We Love You Michael!!!!â¥â¥
2007-04-23 07:36:25 · answer #3 · answered by ♥Stranger In Maine™♥ (Thriller) 7 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Yeah, she must have been one desperate lady!
2007-04-23 00:38:57 · answer #4 · answered by Bunny83 2 · 3⤊ 1⤋