a five year bankrolled trip to europe, where you were given a daily stipend of only ten dollars a day to spend, or a trip to the moon but you could only stay on the lunar surface for forty-five minutes-which one would you choose and why?
2007-04-22 15:31:57 · 41 answers · asked by comic book guy 5 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
the moon. I can always find a way to get to Europe. How incredible would it be to look down on earth from the moon. I would take 5min. Just to have that oppurtunity would be incredible. Just let me know when we leave.
2007-04-22 15:35:51 · answer #1 · answered by woodbutcher21 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I would rather take the five year bankrolled trip to euroupe...even given a daily stipend of only $10 a day to spend. I could get small jobs to get me by, if I needed more money.
The moon? Sure it would be once in a lifetime...but, I would be disapointed for only being on the surface for 45 mins. And, they still haven't figured out how to deal with the bone mass loss issue. That isn't work 45 mins on the moon for me. I love Mom E!
2007-04-22 15:36:56 · answer #2 · answered by What, what, what?? 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
a five year bankrolled trip to europe cause of Big cars go brum brum... San Marino is in the unusual position of hosting a Formula One Grand prix every year´since 1980. I was actually in San Marino during the 2003 Gran prix, and sure enough there was a Ferrarri in the main square. Unfortunately it was last years car, the driver and the actual race were at Imola in Italy a few miles away. As Bernie Ecclestones worldwide circus continues to find new venues to use (or rather to seek out places that allow tobacco sponsorship) the San Marino Grand Prix may well be lost as there already is an Italian Grand Prix every year at Monza.
2007-04-22 15:40:37 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
the MOON cause u could go 2 Europe anytime u want but a trip 2 the moon?45 minutes would be 5 years 2 me!LOL
2007-04-22 15:49:28 · answer #4 · answered by AllTimeKendra. 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Europe, no question. The amount of growth and experience that could happen there for five years would easily outweigh a 45 minute moon trip.
2007-04-22 16:09:23 · answer #5 · answered by Get Smart™ 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Trip to the moon.
I would choose a trip to the Moon, because I cannot get to the Moon by myself. It takes multi-millions of dollars currently and you need "connections" in the space industry.
I can, however, travel to Europe now or in the near future, because the expenses are manageable.
Interesting question.
2007-04-22 16:06:22 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Europe
2007-04-22 15:34:12 · answer #7 · answered by Stone Cold 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I choose the moon, because ten dollars a day in Europe won't get you much.
2007-04-22 15:36:42 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Europe for sure! There's nothing to do on the moon and everything to do in Europe, even with only 10 dollars a day.
2007-04-22 15:34:19 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
The moon I wouldn't need the $10.
2007-04-22 15:35:34 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋