I don't. This same old, same old conspiracy drivel is stinking up Yahoo Answers.
2007-04-22 12:06:05
·
answer #1
·
answered by vegaswoman 6
·
3⤊
3⤋
Bush resisted creating the 9/11 commission.
2007-04-22 21:11:49
·
answer #2
·
answered by sal 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't think Bush lied about 9/11. There has been no proof of it, there never will be proof of it. There can be no proof where there is no lie.
and by the way coming from a Jew, Israel rocks!!!
2007-04-22 19:06:21
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
Israel been are ally seance ww2 ww1 as well others second theres no proof no facts.
2007-04-22 20:02:25
·
answer #4
·
answered by Jeremy P 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Why are you so convinced he DID lie about anything? Have you had access to the same reports and military strategists and personnel and news reports HE has, or are you listening to over-inflated, hyped up entertainment packages we refer to as the media today?
If you're listening to CNN or some other liberal news forum, don't be too sure about what you think you know............a little propoganda goes a long, long way!
2007-04-22 18:57:22
·
answer #5
·
answered by CassandraM 6
·
4⤊
3⤋
I think he is protecting Clinton from being charged with Treason.
Sandy Berger stole and destroyed classified documents to protect Clinton from the 9/11 Commission Investigation.
No doubt, Clinton was somehow involved.
2007-04-22 18:44:27
·
answer #6
·
answered by wolf 6
·
5⤊
4⤋
Ah another nut case on the loose.
You have no real proof that would stand up in the harsh light of reality.
You belong in the same group as those who deny the holocaust, moon landing, Rosewell UFO crash, etc.
Come back when you want to face reality.
2007-04-22 18:40:34
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
7⤊
3⤋
He didn't lie about 9/11. It actually happened.
2007-04-22 18:46:25
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
2⤋
You mean the 7-11 because there is no conspiracy theory
2007-04-22 18:40:23
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
7⤊
2⤋
I don't think Bush lied about 9/11. There has been no proof of it, there never will be proof of it. There can be no proof where there is no lie.
2007-04-22 18:38:59
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
4⤋
Cause he hates to get his *** kicked out of office. And most likely an impeachment won't get done against him any way. He knows that his behind is covered at no cost. Hell, when he is done, he can compfortably retire in his Texas Ranch. They own ton's of oil any how and are very rich people.
2007-04-22 18:52:44
·
answer #11
·
answered by angelikabertrand64 5
·
1⤊
5⤋