English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-04-22 08:07:51 · 3 answers · asked by Mili 1 in Arts & Humanities History

3 answers

slingshots n javelins
bronze and metal weapons
chariots
phalanxes
archers
cavalry..light n heavy
heavier armour
gun powder
massed artillery
trenches
tanks n airpower
mushroom clouds

2007-04-22 08:31:21 · answer #1 · answered by Its not me Its u 7 · 1 1

It's not politically correct for "civilians" to die in war anymore. War has to be much more precise these days. It can be a little detached even. A lot of pilots talk about how many people they think they may have killed, but since they never seen them they just think of it as a target, or object they destroyed. It's a lot different than standing a few yards from the enemy a shooting at each other.

2007-04-22 15:16:32 · answer #2 · answered by John Boy 4 · 0 1

unfortuanately war has exponentially grown both more efficient and impersonal.originally for mere survival at hands length with stone or club,now we can rid cities of life without harming cities or potentially end most to all life on earth with electronic precision/decision/and the same lack of personal responsibilty madmen share.thousands are killed and others say its not enough.the ending of one life is a crime,the inhumanity that all in society share by their quiet accepted permission/ignorance is astonishing.the more we know about life,the better society gets at ending life or greater and greater disinterst in preserving it...

2007-04-22 15:26:06 · answer #3 · answered by thunderstrike 1 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers