in spite of beign an intelligent creatures and be able to think,create and talk we are week physically and vulnerable,we are not as fast as cheetahs,not as strong&frosious as tigers,not able to fly as falcons,swim like dolphins.If we get attacked on a street or by animals we (humans) we be dead in matter of seconds,if we are bitten by sharks or tigers or snakes,or even other human we can't survive.
so im thinking that all humans should stop wearing those stupid clothes and wear what provide protections at least aganist normal threats (.pollution) because a belive that there will be a time where you can't go out unless you wear protection suit
2007-04-22
08:01:58
·
8 answers
·
asked by
lonely heart
2
in
Science & Mathematics
➔ Biology
When was the last time a human was attacked by a wild animal? This happens so rarely that it makes the news when it occurs.
There is a guy, Troy Hurtubise (see link) who is a maverick inventor, and who came up with suit of armor that could protect the wearer against virtually anything.
The point is, how often is that happening that one is attacked? And how much does the suit weight? And how much does it cost?
Don;t you think it would be more sensible to eliminate the pollution, than to try to protect one from it with a suit, the same way we've eliminated dangerous animals from the cities we live in?
2007-04-22 08:16:02
·
answer #1
·
answered by Vincent G 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
I think your idea that humans are weak and vulnerable is based on pure misconception. First, you make it sound like no human can possibly survive an animal attack, much less win a fight with an animal. Where do you get this idea?
Second, while you mention advantageous characteristics of other animals, you completely ignore the advantages humans possess. How ferocious is that tiger going to be after he falls into my pit trap? How fast is that cheetah going to be when a dozen of us humans hit him with spears?
Just a suggestion, but you should quit looking at yourself as some weak, helpless creature just because you're a human.
JMB
2007-04-22 08:34:11
·
answer #2
·
answered by levyrat 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Instead of wearing a protective suit, I stay away from lions, and tigers, and bears, Oh My! If I want to out run an animal, I get in my car. If I want to out fly one, I get a plane ticket. If I don't want to get bitten by a shark, I stay out of the ocean.
As for the only real threat mentioned, no suit can protect you against pollution. Pollution gets into our water and our food and the air.
2007-04-22 08:14:34
·
answer #3
·
answered by my_alias_id 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
In terms of wilderness environment and competing with what we were born with, yes, humans are weak physically. So, if caught by surprise or unprepared a human would lose a struggle against an aggressive large predator. Wolf, lion, bear, shark, etc.-To answer your question, we are already garbed in protective gear. We created a "bubble" around ourselves by destroying predators habitat and then creating defenses against these predators turning to humans as a food source. ie. Forts, towns, buildings in general. So our current protective gear is cars, homes, offices, etc. A personal suit has not been developed because it would inhibit humans' natural mating process. Humans need to be able to see and hear each others' form to initiate mating rituals. How is a woman going to flirt in some cumbersome suit?
We are already attempting to adjust our gear in terms of pollution by limiting emissions etc.
2007-04-22 08:54:27
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hm mm. Very interesting.
I can think of a couple of times when I've needed a suit like this, mostly because I was far from home and I didn't understand the dangers of the local ecosystems.
Like .... now I know not to go wading for shells in the early evening twilight. Oh, so THAT's why my family was the only group of people who were knee-deep in the water feeling for shells with our feet. It's a wonder anyone survives out of their element. We midwesterners aren't ocean-literate.
So, put your suit on eBay and I'll buy it!
2007-04-22 21:38:19
·
answer #5
·
answered by ecolink 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
the 2d modification assure's us the suited to guard ourselves whether a majority of those gun bans are tremendously plenty asserting you're actually not in charge sufficient to guard yourselves. So we the government will and that's a huge mistake. as quickly as we supply up the accountability to guard ourselves we are able to start to lose different liberties such because of the fact the 1st modification. we've a god given precise to preserve ourselves. we are able to ban all weapons and crime cost will upward thrust. the reason being you have taken palms far off from in charge electorate and leave them defenseless together as the Criminals who're already under their very own gun ban carry anyhow and could proceed to victimize human beings. for each gun that's taken out of the regulation abiding electorate palms for the time of the law and rules that are handed. the human beings who supported and handed those rules have blood on their palms. I definitely have chosen to take accountability for my lifestyles and that i've got a fireplace arm. i don't seek for out to apply my hearth arm and that i circulate out of my thank you to not could desire to think of roughly making use of it. i don't choose to break human beings because of the fact lifestyles is so significant to me. So significant that the seen making use of this device is barely to be certain my very own lifestyles. this is the way maximum regulation abiding electorate think of and once you disarm us. we can't only have colleges to be bothered approximately shootings because of the fact everywhere would be a gun loose zone. i visit college for criminal justice and one element i'm getting to understand is rules are there to guard criminals. Gun bans to me propose the human beings in the back of it are professional criminal. scientific learn has shown crime will improve in international locations including Australia and Brittan. In D.C. gun crime rose after the gun ban. In Massachusetts the place I stay crime is on the upward thrust. In Georgia they handed a regulation the place human beings could desire to have a gun in each and every living house. they don't enforce this regulation yet Crime has plummeted while in comparison with something of the rustic. they only isn't waiting to guard us. not all human beings no count how confusing they combat.
2016-11-26 20:50:57
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Start working on it.
2007-04-22 08:09:28
·
answer #7
·
answered by chelebeee 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
thats why i use condoms
2007-04-22 08:05:04
·
answer #8
·
answered by vern 5
·
0⤊
0⤋