I would. I am a guy. I just think it would be nice to break the no-women-has-ever-been-President barrier. Plus I think she would be great. A LOT better than Bush anyways.
2007-04-22 07:34:20 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Star this if you think its interesting. If you want to see everyones point of veiw later.
2007-04-22 07:47:49 · update #1
It will take a lot more than breaking no-women-has-ever-been barrier. She is a political hack with little experience. It's like rooting for Barry Bonds to break Hank Aaron's home run record. It's no good if you are a cheater.
2007-04-22 07:51:49 · answer #1 · answered by stupidcaucasian 6 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Hillary Clinton has made some particularly unfavorable options over the previous few weeks. She is down in New Orleans blasting the federal governement, which she is a ingredient of for their persisted loss of help for the area. final I checked her celebration is now in potential and not something has replaced. Then she makes a speech approximately how she has this remarkable theory to furnish Pre-okay to young little ones interior the indoors city, and how this on my own will help families ruin the cycle of poverty. there is already such an corporation, and that i artwork for it. HEAD start up. it particularly is not a clean theory, this is been around for years. This software additionally would not help families ruin the cycle of poverty. Of the 20 young little ones in my type 15 of them their mothers and fathers have been head start up young little ones aswell. Very idealistic, yet no longer a fact. remarkable theory Hillary, next she will let us know that she has this massive theory to help us flow our militia around the rustic stated as the line gadget.
2016-10-13 05:02:40 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I will if she wins the ticket. Let's put it this way, for the first time in my voting life, I will vote strictly party this go around. I would vote for a one-eyed democratic hamster before allowing another extremist republican have our office again. Sad, but true.
Just can't wait to 2008!
2007-04-22 10:10:33 · answer #3 · answered by lovemcss 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Honestly, I don't know yet if I will consider voting for Senator Clinton.
There are too many solid candidates running at the present time. I'll have to wait until the choices narrow.
If it comes down to making sure she becomes president, there is no question. Better her than any republican running this time.
2007-04-22 07:38:36 · answer #4 · answered by Floyd G 6 · 4⤊ 2⤋
You bet your butt she has my support.
Universal Health care. Equal pay. Stabilizing the military. Veterans assistance.
I don't care what anyone else says, this is so much better than the wack job we have as a President right now.
And besides; it will always take a Clinton to clean up after a Bush.
2007-04-22 07:48:43 · answer #5 · answered by Jeremiah 5 · 4⤊ 2⤋
Hillary is far too conservative and establishment-oriented. She's more talk than action. She will just continue the same old conservative establshment program, including the ongoing domination and slaughter in the Middle East.
2007-04-22 08:09:59 · answer #6 · answered by Skeptic 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Voting for her just because there has never been a female president is stupid. That's like voting for Donald the rump because there has never been a president that filed bankruptcy
2007-04-22 07:42:42 · answer #7 · answered by porcerelllisman q 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
No I would not, because I do not trust her, and I do not support the majority of her policies. I personally dont care if a woman is Pres or not, I just want the best person for the job.
2007-04-22 07:41:05 · answer #8 · answered by aslongasitsfunky 3 · 1⤊ 3⤋
I would NEVER, but I am not a US citizen. I Don't see how the women issue is relevant. I would vote for any peace-loving & justice loving woman who uses deodorant-not for a war monger who doesn't. Use deodorant and make love-no war!
2007-04-22 08:47:10 · answer #9 · answered by Avner Eliyahu R 6 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Hillary Clinton couldn't run a dog fight , much less the U.S. She just wants in there so her useless husband can be in the White House again.
2007-04-22 07:39:47 · answer #10 · answered by The Count 7 · 1⤊ 4⤋