English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

7 answers

They were both from the United States of America.

2007-04-22 07:59:42 · answer #1 · answered by Laurie A 3 · 1 0

Both men were American generals. General Patton was in charge of the American campaign in Africa. General Eisenhower was eventually appointed leader of the Allied forces.

2007-04-22 07:35:01 · answer #2 · answered by Smokey 1 · 1 0

Both generals went to West Point Both fought in the first and Second world wars and both were Americans from the United States.

2007-04-22 07:42:46 · answer #3 · answered by Dave aka Spider Monkey 7 · 0 0

Patton was an American general. There's a good movie about his involvement in WW2 called (ironically) "Patton". If you need to know about what he did, watch it and you'll lear most of what you need to know.

Eisenhower (Ike) was the supreme commander of Allied forces in Europe and Africa and he was also an American.

2007-04-22 08:26:53 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

They both were West Point graduates who fought for the United States.

Patton was described as "the only General that Hitler ever feared".

2007-04-22 07:30:21 · answer #5 · answered by Mark F 5 · 0 0

George Patton will be extra effectual compared to a Ulysses S. provide than a generic of as we talk. Generals of yesteryear truly frolicked contained in the sphere with their troops. provide spent all of his time contained in the sphere. Patton replaced into obtainable even as a large push replaced into on, yet he also loved extra down time than even he theory he deserved. as we talk's generals are accomplishing stay wars in command centers, that are frequently 1000's of miles from the strive against zone. in certain circumstances they're set up in thoroughly different international places. via as we talk's criteria, Patton replaced right into a cowboy ! certainly, he replaced into an efficient chief contained in the sphere, and prefer provide he kept the enemy's ft to the hearth. yet, he replaced into also arrogant, egotistical, vindictive, and weak. In different words, he replaced into human. Patton replaced into unpredictable and careless in his determination of words, and for a generic he lacked self self-discipline, yet he positive replaced into commonplace because he ought to narrate to the common guy. regrettably incorrect you're saying ! you're a romantic, and in straightforward words see the hype that George raised. in case you've been to ask Ike, or Bradley (both 5-movie star Generals, of their careers) they could possibly say that George Patton replaced right into a soreness contained in the butt !

2016-12-04 11:22:19 · answer #6 · answered by turnbough 3 · 0 0

america

2007-04-22 07:16:06 · answer #7 · answered by -entropy! 3 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers