nukes are guns and the police dont want these families to have these `guns` because of what they might do with them, do you still believe in `gun control` or not? hmmm?! [dont forget it was the `police` that were the first to use `guns` to end a `standoff`] or should i rephrase the question?
2007-04-22 06:12:22 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
Yes, I do !!!
2007-04-22 06:15:03 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
North Korea merits each and every of the undesirable press. one million. Warmongering 2. no longer prepared to barter 3. no longer looking after it extremely is human beings (to the factor of starvation). Iran is a real gray section and not incredibly elementary. one million. no longer warmongering, yet actively finding out for its hobbies. on occasion, the place it extremely is hobbies are the comparable because of the fact the U. S. working with the u . s . (i.e. vs. Taliban or Saddam) yet then as quickly because it is composed of opposite hobbies it incredibly works in it extremely is very own want (whether that isn't the interest of the U. S.). i.e. installation a Shia government in Iraq. helping Hezbullah in lebanon. 2. prepared to barter - yet the two Iran and the U. S. are caught in a chilly war hate mentality from the Seventies. 3. a great number of undesirable blood between US and Iran: CIA kicked out Iran's democratic government interior the 50s in replace for a absolute monarchy. in the process the Nineteen Eighties u . s . armed Saddam with hundreds of thousands of $ of weapons ensuing interior the dying of 500,000 Iranians - by chemical war and time-honored potential. that would desire to describe merely slightly the "dying to usa chanting". 4. tries to guard it extremely is very own human beings - mutually because it has an prolonged thank you to pass till it reaches the point of human rights and freedoms that we interior the west take with no attention, human beings can trip, say what they choose, and for the better area do what they choose. the comparable can't be reported for many different international locations. I recommend you seem at Newsweek mag this week - they have a undeniable checklist on "the real iran".
2016-10-28 16:55:43 · answer #2 · answered by helfinstine 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You make too many suppositions.....
Any Conservative will disagree with you that the US are the World Police. That is NOT a conservative ideology.
Nukes and hand guns are far different entities, and your oversimplification by comparison is inane.
Liberals believe in gun control.... not Conservatives.
Let me know when you get a clue.
2007-04-22 06:18:19 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
The U.S. is not the police for the world. Those countries have their own police.
Get real.
Btw, you never did answer my question as to how to keep the thugs from getting illegal weapons under your proposed gun control. And again, a real solution, not a pipe dream.
Still waiting and being the typical liberal, you won't have the answer.
2007-04-22 06:17:10 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
People need guns for protection.
Nations do not need Nuclear weapons for protection.
2007-04-22 06:15:58 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
yes there should be better control with the ownership of guns..
2007-04-22 06:16:52 · answer #6 · answered by Bella 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
These are really bad analogies, and you are in the wrong category.
2007-04-22 06:17:06 · answer #7 · answered by Firespider 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋