An USA citizen husband marries an Indian lady.After 5yrs,having a child decides to seek diovorce without elimoney and child support,strategicaly drives the wifewith child penniless out of USA, sends both to India with instruction to return when the child gets18yr old. The wife and the child decides to return USA against the wishes of husband so he issues athreat from USA to India through ISDcall.The wife worried about safety in USA decides to cancel booked flight to USA,continues staying in india.After nine months of the stay in India by the wife and child in India,thedivorce order ispassed through default by the USA court ignoring the fact that respondent's inability to attend the court was only due to domestic violant action of the petitioner and his issue of threat during the process of law and creating hurdles. USA Court ignores fact that verification of threat can only bedone by USApolice at its behest, and the impossibility of substantiate by the receiver of threat in India.
2007-04-22
05:51:09
·
5 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Law & Ethics