English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

17 answers

Clever spelling innuendo.
All torture should be abolished. Bloody cruel.
Even false information could be given under duress just to stop the agony.

2007-04-22 01:37:56 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Yes, it was a slip of the accent that caused this. The torture policy was meant to be for ear racks instead.

2007-04-22 01:32:04 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

whats is the policy of torturing eye racks

2007-04-22 02:19:19 · answer #3 · answered by david devito 1 · 1 0

I guess it depends on who you are torturing. If it's an American or an American ally, it's unacceptable.

If it's a member of a terrorist cell, or some megalomaniac with plans to dominate the world, then I say go for it!

2007-04-22 01:32:09 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

When I heard about eye racks I ran.

2007-04-22 01:29:39 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

I don't think they have a policy. But the you essay does. That one should be abolished.
.

2007-04-22 01:32:33 · answer #6 · answered by NoahTall 4 · 1 0

Yes the water board works just fine!

2007-04-22 01:29:37 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

My eye ranned in the other direction, I didnt know which way to look at disorder.

2007-04-22 02:02:57 · answer #8 · answered by I forget 5 · 3 0

Oh I wish I had an answer that I could use on here for your question, love it, keep up the good work.

2007-04-22 01:32:53 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

yes it should you can contact(lens) me to get things moving on abolishing these ideous things

2007-04-22 01:31:08 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers