Gods possible flaw? Human design.?

Question

I have often pondered something about Gods creation of man and woman.
If God knows all and sees all then I would like to know what was he thinking when he created the female. Just hear me out on this ok.
A female is biologically able to have a baby when she is about 14 (some younger) yet psychologically is not equipted to handle a baby at this age.
So from an engineering standpoint wouldnt it have been better for female puberty to be initiated either at a later age or even better triggered by some type of emotional/psychological trigger? Like some type of emotional growth within the brain that would then trigger puberty. LOL granted some people may not have had ever had babies but thats fine as well.
Seriously given the state of increasing numbers of pregnant teens God must have forseen this. And dont tell me this the work of the devil...thats just a cop out answer.

Answer 1

well from a darwin standpoint you would say that woman can concieve children before man as a survival mechanism.

An older male can always concieve the young woman thus having more possible children.

IE 1 man can get 10 woman pregnent. 1 woman can get only pregenent once so for survival of the species it would benifit the race for them to be able to concieve soon as possible.

another flaw i see is the apendix. wtf is it for? NOTHING!

Answer 2

Kids today reach puberty earlier and develop sooner physically, but mentally are not mature. Even into their early 20's. Some Sociologists consider adolescence to last until 23 or 24 now. This lack of maturity is due to social circumstances, not biological! Kids stay in school longer and stay at home longer. This means they are dependent upon their parents and just don't mature. Years ago, this just wasn't expected of children.
Biologically, humans are just like any other animal. Reproduction and survival are the main concern. That just does not work with society today.

Answer 3

there are distinctive popular "flaws", or vestigial features in human beings. clever layout is a fallacy that asserts that because of the fact the universe ought to have had a commencing up, it is going to have been created by employing a limiteless being, which isn't even a germane answer to the question of the inspiration of the universe. it particularly is the argument of the 1st reason. This argument maintains that, because each little thing that occurs has a reason, there ought to be a widespread reason from which the whole sequence starts. The argument suffers, even if, from the comparable affliction as that of the elephant and the tortoise. it is declared (i do no longer understand with what reality) that a definite Hindu logician believed the earth to sit down down back upon an elephant. while asked what the elephant rested upon, he spoke back that it rested upon a tortoise. while asked what the tortoise rested upon, he reported, "i'm uninterested in this. assume we modify the project." This illustrates the unsatisfactory character of the 1st-reason argument. although, you will discover it in some extremely-present day treatises on physics, which contend that actual techniques, traced backward in time, prepare that there ought to have been a surprising commencing up and infer that this exchange into as a results of divine creation. They intently abstain from tries to coach that this hypothesis makes concerns greater intelligible. here are the final human vestigial features: The vermiform appendix is a vestige of the cecum. The coccyx, or tailbone, is the remnant of a lost tail. awareness the teeth are vestigial third molars that human ancestors used to help in grinding down plant tissue. human beings and different primates such because of the fact the orangutan and chimpanzee even if have ear muscular tissues that are minimally stepped forward and non-functional. The plica semilunaris is a small fold of tissue on the interior corner of the attention. this is the vestigial remnant of the nictitating membrane (the "third eyelid") it is cutting-edge in different animals including birds, reptiles, and fish.

Answer 4

It amazes me, the audacity of people to assume to criticise Almighty God for His decisions when most cannot drive a car without running into something every 7 or so years. They cannot seem to live without overwhelming debt. They cannot be satisfied with living in the richest and freeiest country in the world and complain about a government some don't even take time to vote for. You are straining at gnats while trying to swallow camels. Stop trying to make Father God human. Just not possible. His ways are so far above us, we are stupid in comparison.

Answer 5

Yes, most people could design a better homan body then god. A third hand would often be useful

Answer 6

We can answer this type of question with reference to evolution and biology, religion and god add nothing at all.

Answer 7

God? Problems? No way!

God is perfect!

Not really, don't trust anything God does or makes.
It is bound to age, fall apart, disease, or die (shudders!)
I really don't blame people for hatin' on God.

Answer 8

well in terms of history people used to have really short lives.

And then's 40 was today's 80

Answer 9

of course its the work of Satan, didnt GOD say dont do immoral things?? adultery as well?? anything against it is the devils work, u need to read the bible and stop acting like a smart alick

Answer 10

Girls are perfectly capable of caring for a child.
It's not the girl... it's the laws, restrictions, beaureautcratic crap that makes it hard for girls to have kids young.