They both have missiles aimed at Indian cities.
They both stand to lose out from India's rising superpower status.
They have both fight wars with India.
They both have an anti-Indian alliance in place.
They both have sponsored terrorism and/or seperatist movements within India.
They both are developing their military and often use India as a justification.
They both use simulations of Indian military in their war games
They both use propaganda in their domestic states to keep the public opinion anti-indian.
so who should India be most wary about the most???
2007-04-21
03:11:26
·
40 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Military
On top of that China's regime is heavily influenced by ancient chinese statecraft with it's concomitant ideas in deception and betrayal (in the words of sun tsu "all warfare is based on deception")
Whereas Pakistan is an official Islamic state. Islam is a religion that has made no attempt to hide its hatred and enmity for Hinduism and has constantly endeavoured to destroy Hinduism for as long as it has existed. In islam, Muslims are encouraged to make fools out of non-believers by pretending to be their friends - something that the mughals majored in. In islam they call it "Thakya".
2007-04-21
03:20:36 ·
update #1
if India were to become a super power, it is to compete with china.china is dumping goods at cheaper rates.the rulers should concentrate how they could manufacture at cheaper rates and increase our exports .in every field, china is becoming not a threat but a competitor .the Indians are to face the challenges thrown by the china and strive hard to make it no 1.Pakistan is not a real threat but it causes nuisance. steps are to be taken to shut the mouth of Pakistan.
2007-04-27 01:25:42
·
answer #1
·
answered by nightingale 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
If it was a situation over what country could do more damage to India it would definatly be China... But the biggest threat to India is Pakistan because China doesn't threaten and hate India like Pakistan does
2016-05-20 02:47:45
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well India is capable of retaliating in a nuclear war against the both of them.Pakistan does not really have anything to lose (I heard this in a interview between a former Pakistani Admiral and a U.S journalist).The former Admiral said there is no future in Pakistan and that India has a larger future.He also said there was no hope in Pakistan and he would be willing to see his own children die in a nuclear retaliatory strike from India.He also said that India does have a larger arsenal and that Pakistan would be completely inhialated but he said India's dream of becoming a superpower would be lost,and that India has more to lose.
India and China would both not like a war.The Chinese are not as suicidal as the Pakistani government and know that going to war with India would mean both contries would not have the dream of becoming a superpower anymore if they go into a war.India recently tested Agni 3 so major Chinese cities would suffer losses.The Agni 2 would also take major cities in the southern part of China.But this will never happen.Thats because India is China's 8th largest trading partner and will become the 1st by 2010,India and China both commenced naval excercises recently,and there is the fact that both want closer ties because thats the only way they are going to progress.So overall its Pakistan who is a bigger threat since they will be more willing to go to war and have nothing to lose.China has a much stronger military force then Pakistan however but would not see any benifit in going to war.
Right now all I am concerned about are fanatical Pakistani patriots who feel so hopeless with their lives they tend to find insulting Hindus the only way to satisfy their pathetic existence.But ofcourse if Hindusim were to really be explained to them their brain capacity cannnot really comprehend.So let them live in their pathetic existence.I am reffering to the guy who made the comment about Hindus.I doubt an American would do that as they are more tolernant.
2007-04-21 07:38:26
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
The real threat is from China. Some leaders in the past have unwittingly blurted out this perception which is held in the inner circle. All the improvement that is sought by India in its military Establishment is only to counter the possible attack from China and the combined might of China and Pakistan. China finds an easy ally in Pakistan to contain India, which eyed with suspicion by China.
2007-04-25 00:19:09
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Pakistans interest is survival (and of course survival of its military elite). If India should threaten this survival then Pakistan is a greater danger to India than China.
Chinas interest is great power status, a vast regional hegemony and industrial advancement. In all of these goals they are concurring with India but their is no likely military solution that could help China to better its position vis-à-vis India. The danger from China is not a military one but a danger of loosing ground in the race for economic development.
2007-04-25 21:41:47
·
answer #5
·
answered by Thomas S 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Both china and Pakistan, but the biggest threat is china,china occupancy 42,000 kilometre miles of ours, where we in the attack of them. but Pakistan , even after been defeated by us holds our land, .
we can win war against pakisthan, but with china ...?the very interesting point is that china in 62 attack had supportes within us ie the communist , and pakisthan always have such a supporting gruop all over india,
if anybody tells this truth then will be addressed as fundamentalist.
we need to be very much careful about our politian, remember because of these politician we divided in 1947, failure in china war, and the ongoing attack of pakisthan sponsord terrorism.
max muller by the direction of his boss Mekkale introdused " Aryan Invasion' The anti indian forces now repeat , this for thier win in election,
Be proud of the great tradition ogf mother inda ,
2007-04-21 03:50:36
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Everytime Bush or his administration makes a stupid blunder by threatening or insulting an oil or natural resource nation, China goes in and throws a lot of money into the country and makes deals . They've done it in Iran, Argentina, and central American nations. Right now the Chinese government is extremely clever in combating the US fascists by using diplomacy and money (money we dispatched there through greedy corporations) - China is swimming in US dough.
So what did Bush do about it? He insulted the Chinese by having them for lunch instead of dinner, which is a diplomatic blunder. What did the Prime Minister do afterwards? He flew directly to another US/insulted nation and make another deal.
So China is the biggest threat because they are smarter than this current US Administration which has done so much damage, the only way to dig our way out is to get rid of the "Bushies" fast.
2007-04-21 03:21:22
·
answer #7
·
answered by ToYou,Too! 5
·
3⤊
1⤋
China
2007-04-29 01:53:20
·
answer #8
·
answered by sushobhan 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
The worst enemy of India are the Indians who sap the will to resist aggression with endless prattle about keeping lines of
communication open, giving away territory earned in blood
spilled by military service, and rank cowardice when drums
signal an advance. Indians claim to know their enemy but do they also fear their friends in India enough?
2007-04-28 17:27:43
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
China is so huge it is virtually impossible to respond to an attack in a meaningful way. But China is more concerned with economic growth at the moment, and is more apt to be involved in subtler and longer term destabilizing actions.
Pakistan is more apt to be directly involved in violence and direct military attack.
I'd worry about Pakistan in the short term, and be very concerned about China in the long term.
Of course,if I were the US, I'd be really concerned about China too. We fail to appreciate their size - there are more students in China in the top 10% of studies than there are students in all of the US.
2007-04-21 03:17:42
·
answer #10
·
answered by Uncle John 6
·
3⤊
0⤋