English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I was reading about Blackwater USA today, and it scared the hell out of me.

A megarich fundie called Erik Prince has his own army of mercenaries that he sub-contracts to the Bush administration for use both internationally and in the states (the were used after hurricane Katrina and are currently in Iraq).

The benefit for the Bush administration is that these guys aren't bound by the same rules and regulations the military have. ie: They don't have to justify there actions to anyone but their employer.

Aside from the obvious appalling aspects of this, is it a concern that Blackwater could start to develop it's own agenda and take unilateral action without even being contracted to the US government?

Would it be fair to call them a fundamentalist army?

2007-04-21 03:04:47 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

5 answers

Private (hirable) military forces are to be destroyed. A military power that has no loyalties except for $$$ and exchangable leaders... is a danger to the entire human race. Destroy on sight.

2007-04-21 03:08:51 · answer #1 · answered by Invisible_Flags 6 · 4 1

Your ridiculous paranoid opinion has been noted, and given the fact that our enemies are NOT bound by any rules, hide behind women and children, take refuge in mass murder mosques, worship death, and spread hate like an epidemic disease, I give 100% support to any such defense, and lets not overlook the fact that the Geneva convention rules do not apply to our military either, given the fact that the war against terror is not an actual military VS military war, it's a fight against several large groups of renegade genocidal maniacs with an agenda to conquer the world and force their death cult upon every worldwide culture with the exception of the Jewish culture of which they seek to wipe off the face of the planet, so NO, it's not fair to dub them a fundamentalist army.

2007-04-21 03:27:54 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

enable's no longer ignore to point the "vehicle bomb attack" BAGHDAD -- The Iraqi authorities Monday ordered Blackwater u . s . a ., the protection agency that protects U.S. diplomats, to end paintings and go away the country after the deadly capturing of 8 Iraqi civilians following a vehicle bomb attack antagonistic to a State branch convoy. So, it in straightforward words got here about because they were lower than attack.

2016-12-04 10:01:31 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

75% of those who come back from that illegal war are psychotic.

Some kind of curse ......


"Cursed be he that taketh reward to slay an innocent person. And all the people shall say, Amen" (Deuteronomy 27:25).



/

2007-04-21 03:09:35 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Private armies are a threat to democracy and allowing them to exist defies common sense.

2007-04-21 03:12:52 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

fedest.com, questions and answers