English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-04-20 20:34:18 · 18 answers · asked by LumpiaEATER ! 2 in News & Events Current Events

18 answers

I think that Cho Seung-Hui was severely neglected as a child. When a person commits an act as horrific as this, there were unquestionably indicators of a problem early on. It has come out that he was possibly autistic, but that his parents could not afford and chose not to get him treatment. His parents and family could have prevented this, but they chose to disregard the problem and leave him alone to make sense of the world as best he could. His world was obviously one of devastation. I am not saying that this was intentional on his parents part; most raise their children mirroring their own parents. What is scary to me about our culture, is that there seems to be a taboo when it comes to pointing out parental mistakes. Can't it be, that even if it is unintentional, parents must be held responsible for abusing or emotionally abandoning a child. Children do not ask to be born. I think that in order to prevent events such as this one, a serious focus needs to be placed on early childhood development and parenting skills. It astounds me that we need a drivers license to operate a car, but not a license to parent. I say this metaphorically. Can you imagine where we might be if Saddam and Bush learned as children how to navigate relationships with integrity and take responsibility for their actions. Terrorism begins in the home. Somehow as a society we must start paying more attention to the grief and burden we place upon our children's shoulders. Its hard to look in the mirror and see how one has failed as a parent, but its the only way to break the cycle passed on from one generation to the next. I believe if Cho Seung-Hui was cared for and been given treatment at an early age, this tragedy may have been prevented. Help me to pass this message along and educate others. If you are a parent, check in with yourself on a regular basis. Apologize to your children so they learn how to take responsibility when it is their turn to be a parent. Pay attention and listen to your children, they are smarted than you think and they absorb everything. Lets do the right thing one child at a time. We owe it to the victims of Virginia Tech and to our children who may be struggling as Cho Seung-Hui did. Thanks for listening. My heart goes out to everyone who is suffering in the aftermath of this unthinkable tragedy. If there was anyway I could help hold your pain, I would.

2007-04-20 21:56:07 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Dead men don't talk. Maybe we could get some of the other questions about the whole incident if he were still alive today. Like why no one was allowed to leave campus with a murdered on the loose, and why this guy had a 60% fatality rate while using weapons that rarely kill anyone . Why the police didn't move in until the guy was dead and why their was reported of being two killers at first then one. Why was the CIA recruiting from VT prier to this and why was this shooting at the only place in Virginia where the conceal and carry law is restricted? As always the only guy we know of who could answer some of the above is dead once again. Did he kill himself? You say yes? How do you know? Oh ya the government controlled media.

2007-04-20 21:02:49 · answer #2 · answered by Stephen 2 · 1 0

Heard an interview with a psychiatrist specializing in inferiority complexes and body language who said that Cho had an inferiority complex that was made worse by being a control freak. Due to the fact he didn't have control over others and over events in his life he started developing feelings of inferiority this caused him to feel that since he couldn't control others he would blame others for "failing him" so he decided to take them out the reason he committed suicide is because he would become a martyr in his own mind he felt that people would finally understand and feel that he was right. He wrote some reasons but remember they're the ramblings of a madman the body language tells more than words.

In other words...he was totally off his nut, the cheese fell off his cracker a long time ago, he was running on a lean mixture, he was a couple of sandwiches short of a picnic...to surmise...he was quite mad.

2007-04-20 20:51:41 · answer #3 · answered by sprydle 5 · 0 0

The virginia tech shooting replaced into an exceedingly tragic shooting. Now the question would be why this happen and how we are able to dodge this from occurring back. i in my view have faith the congress could pass a bill approximately mandatory metallic detectors interior the faculties. there is with regard to the comparable form of individuals in airports, i think of it may artwork to be sure it is preventive. the guy that did it i'm quite particular he replaced into merely offended at his lady chum and went on a psycho rampage because of the fact he possibly watched human beings do it in Iraq each and every of the time. The media is taking a toll on what's occurring interior the international right this moment in my opinion and if toddlers are observing each and every physique of those suicide bombings and each physique of those human beings getting killed, its quite lots asserting to get a recognition interior the U.S. history e book is to shoot as many human beings as you may!!! it extremely is merely undeniable ill astonishing there.

2016-10-28 14:48:54 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

The law made him 100% successful in his massacre and suicide.By not allowing law abiding citizens to carry a gun and giving them at the very least a 0.1% chance of defending them selves.I would say it was the law that kill all those students and teacher.And farther more the law cant and wont be there when you need them,and Cho was killing as the police was arresting the wrong man.If Cho had stopped earlier the man thy arrested the first time would still be in jail and facing death row..The law well never save you in any situation.VOTE gun controllers out of office and put guns in lawful hands.The term ( fish in a barrel) has been changed too ( fish in a school )

2007-04-20 21:35:03 · answer #5 · answered by tdwatch 3 · 0 0

Possibly because he was depressed, and (as I understand) was taking the prescription drug Effexor. Severe depression is a known factor in suicide. Last year, the manufacturer of the drug Effexor added to its warning label the following: MAY CAUSE HOMICIDAL IDEATION! Sound like something that should be legal? Since there is NO WAY to know WHO will have that reaction until they start shooting people.

Hey sprydle, how could a psychiatrist who never interviewd or treated Cho be able to posthumously diagnose him?

2007-04-20 20:50:16 · answer #6 · answered by valmay 3 · 0 0

Because he knew that at the school was the one place where he didn't have to worry about people shooting back.

2007-04-20 21:13:22 · answer #7 · answered by Brummy 2 · 2 0

Why would America arbitrarily declare war on another sovereign nation?



It WOULD have been nice if Cho had been just a LITTLE more selfish, and started with himself, however...

2007-04-20 20:47:02 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

he was a physco person.
and for your information 90% of american population belongs to physco disorder.

2007-04-20 20:38:24 · answer #9 · answered by Robert P 1 · 0 0

lets see the result of the investigation ,, we all have the same question,,

2007-04-20 20:50:12 · answer #10 · answered by mandy 1 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers