isnt that 20/20 or something ?? i hope they are getting arrested and doing hard time
2007-04-20 19:35:54
·
answer #1
·
answered by lady26 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
The funniest part is when they admit that they've watched the episodes but don't recognize the guy that comes out to question them.
Check that. The funniest part are the guys who get caught more than once in the same sting.
I love watching those animals taken into custody outside the house.
2007-04-20 19:45:51
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
They are plain oblivious to the fact that they will inevitably get caught, go to jail , and be posted on the web as a convicted sex offender. So until that day they walk around like some sex deprived weirdo who prays on children!
2007-04-20 19:27:06
·
answer #3
·
answered by DJA30 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
1.)mental illness
Gene Hackman played a pedophile in "Under Suspiscion" and there is a scene in which he has this little speech to a cop interviewing him played by Morgan Freeman about why he's attracted to teenaged girls it's very telling. He goes on about how girls in their late teens have "perfect bodies" compared to older women "Their flat stomachs and smooth skin.." stuff like that and his character is married to the ever so hot Monica Belluci....what's up with that?
2.)intimidation/control
Pedophiles find younger girls easier to manipulate and intimidate.
3.)sexual domination
The pedophile has difficulty keeping an older woman's interest going sexually and finds that an inexperienced girl to be easier to please in bed.
They need treatment.
2007-04-20 20:11:41
·
answer #4
·
answered by sprydle 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
the actual incontrovertible fact that some thing grew to become into considered ‘known’ in the previous doesn’t recommend that it may well be proper constantly. in the 1600’s decrease than British rule, 12-365 days-olds have been sentenced to dying for stealing a loaf of bread. You don’t have self belief me, top? I observed it in a documentary on PBS relating findings of particularly trial data from that era. I’m not making this up. I incredibly have a e book titled ‘A historic past of Western Philosophy’ by potential of Bertrand Russell. in this e book that's pronounced that for the duration of historic Greece, protection stress commanders might attempt to make their squaddies gay. The reasoning: so as that the squaddies does not be distracted from their protection stress missions by potential of ideas of intercourse with females and a consequent desire to flow away the protection stress. right this moment in u . s . a . being gay continues to be respected grounds for dismissal from the protection stress. So, what's “traditionally” ethical turns into immoral with the passage of time (inclusive of intercourse with a 13-y.o.) and what's immoral turns into ethical (inclusive of wearing a mini-skirt in public). --------------- the genuine difficulty is that a 13-y.o. is considered immature and manipulatable. I see not something incorrect with 2 13-y.o.’s fooling around with one yet another. even though it does scare human beings whilst there's a extensive age distinction. the priority is that the older individual is a technique or the different conning or pressuring the greater youthful individual into submission. although, in all probability unbeknownst to you, many U.S. states enable the marriage of a 14-y.o. to a various individual elderly 14 and up if the two mothers and fathers of the 14-y.o.(s) consent to the marriage. (That regulation doesn’t fantastically verify with sexual intercourse.) -------------- i'm male and whilst i grew to become into 13 i might have gladly plowed a number of my extreme college instructors if the prospect had provided itself. yet enable’s face it; women are considered as greater susceptible than boys. If I had a 13-y.o. daughter who grew to become into courting a boy elderly greater effective than 15 i might difficulty. (and that i in my view couldn’t see myself as an grownup doing a 13-y.o. Dude, she’s like a sprint toddler. How waiting can she be for you?)
2016-10-13 02:26:05
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
They think they are not going to be caught.
They are pedophiles who cannot or will not control their desires for children.
2007-04-20 19:26:57
·
answer #6
·
answered by Tumbleweed 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
They have some psychological issues, clearly. They are in need of professional treatment to resolve these desires.
2007-04-20 19:24:17
·
answer #7
·
answered by SantaBud 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Sicko's who should be de-penised. You know, a lop job. not castration.
2007-04-20 19:29:36
·
answer #8
·
answered by lcmcpa 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
they are mentally ill - pedophiles.
2007-04-20 19:24:07
·
answer #9
·
answered by Sam Fisher 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Sick pedophiles. Thankfully sick and STUPID pedophiles.
2007-04-20 19:47:27
·
answer #10
·
answered by dude 6
·
0⤊
0⤋