Why the Main Stream media rejects all Consopiracy Theories that involves Israel? http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs...
Jet fuel burns at 800° to 1500°F, not hot enough to melt steel (2750°F). However, experts agree that for the towers to collapse, their steel frames didn't need to melt, they just had to lose some of their structural strength--and that required exposure to much less heat. "I have never seen melted steel in a building fire," says retired New York deputy fire chief Vincent Dunn, author of The Collapse Of Burning Buildings: A Guide To Fireground Safety. "But I've seen a lot of twisted, warped, bent and sagging steel. What happens is that the steel tries to expand at both ends, but when it can no longer expand, it sags and the surrounding concrete cracks."
"Steel loses about 50 percent of its strength at 1100°F,
What secret material was used in the demolition?
2007-04-20 16:14:03 · 23 answers · asked by Rikjard M 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
I believe thermite was used to melt the steel throughout the building.
Also, super high-explosives were placed throughout the building. That is what blew people, desks, chairs, computers and concrete to absolute DUST.
Never mind the steel beams that were cut by the thermite and ejected hundreds of feet outward as the detonation bombs went off.
Anyone with a brain can see the bombs going off when the buildings collapse.
2007-04-20 16:21:17 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 7⤋
Be enlightened read:
"The 9/11 Commission Report Omissions and Distortions", by David Ray Griffin
"You're Not Stupid! Get The Truth", by William John Cox
"The Greatest Story Ever Sold", by Frank Rich
The full explanation of events of 9/11 are contained in these books.
2007-04-20 16:43:04 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Are you blind or did you just not realize you answered your own question? Since steel loses about half of it's strength at 1100 degrees, and Jet fuel burns up to 1800, add in thousands upon thousands of tons of concrete, steel, electronics, etc... Let's just say it was lucky to have stood so long. Secret material-One huge jet per building.
2007-04-20 16:30:43 · answer #3 · answered by Chase 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The steel you say disappeared was used to build a ship down in Louisiana I think it was. I personally saw steel from the WTC on trucks passing me in Staten Island and in New Jersey. I don't believe the conspiracy thoery at all. If there were other expolsions within the buildings, why could they not also have been set by Arab supporters?
There was a lot of access to the buildings, I've been there many times.
2007-04-20 16:25:18 · answer #4 · answered by Nort 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
it form of sounds like you replied your own question, the nice and cozy temperature weakened the frames sufficiently and they gave way lower than their own weight. The platforms did not disappear, did not melt, and did not evaporate. As for what Bush is acquainted with, i ought to imagine it truly is fortunate that he's acquainted with the position his butt it, or there ought to extremely some brown spots in each single position. As for an Israel conspiracy theory, there are Anti-Semites who ought to trust something about Israel except the actuality.
2016-12-04 09:41:51 · answer #5 · answered by halbritter 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Take your conspiracy theories and shove it.
As to the individual who states that the symmetry of the collapse lends credence to the "explosives" theory:
- Take the WEIGHT of the floors ABOVE the damaged floor and failing steel... it WILL collapse rather symmetrically.
And, steel (24 tons) from the Trade Center was put into the USS New York (LPD-21) a San Antonio Class Landing Transport Dock.
2007-04-20 16:40:03 · answer #6 · answered by mariner31 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
1) The conspiracy was by Islamofascists.
2) Israel had no involvement.
3) Burning fuel can easily generate enough heat to weaken steel. Gravity did the rest. There were no "secret" materials used.
2007-04-20 16:18:21 · answer #7 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 6⤊ 1⤋
Ok.
You just answered yourself. Are you really that dense?
"Jet fuel burns at 800° to 1500°F"
"Steel loses about 50 percent of its strength at 1100°F"
Your words. Not mine.
2007-04-20 16:19:22 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 0⤋
If you really want a good site that shows the quality of the people putting out all the 911 theories then look up Penn and Tellers Bullsh*t. They did an episode that shows the kooks for what they are.
2007-04-20 16:28:12 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
If you genuinely interested in the science, I'd suggest you look at the research and papers by Professor Steven Jones of BYU.
The key point for me was the fact that the 47 steel support structures had to be cut throughout the building before it would fall at free-fall speed. You can find interviews of firemen and others who heard timed sequences of explosions throughout the buildings. It wasn't Bush it was Burt. (Burt is evil!)
The 9/11 Commision report denies the existence of the 47 support structures and the Nova simulation shows the support structure remaining at its full height!
2007-04-20 16:34:55 · answer #10 · answered by Skeptic 7 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Not again ... this tragedy happened almost 5 years ago and everyone who has a properly-adjusted brain has known for a long time what really happened. Cant you Americans put it in your constitution that conspiracy theories are banned, or the idiots who keep churning them out are locked up indefinitely?
2007-04-20 16:53:35 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋