2007-04-20 14:28:00 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Vegaswoman: You are not a kook! But telling the CIA won't do any good. They are all in on the conspiracy. Remember, W's dad once headed up that organization!
2007-04-20 14:37:59 · update #1
Justin: I know about Mt. St. Helen's...but not about Mt. Vesuvius! Can you believe the evil of this man?
2007-04-20 14:39:49 · update #2
Thank God I finally found a like minded person! I have been telling the CIA for years but they think I'm a kook.
2007-04-20 14:32:26 · answer #1 · answered by vegaswoman 6 · 5⤊ 1⤋
George Bush actually is responsible for all presidential assassinations throughout history, all natural disasters including Katrina and the Indian Tsunami, Oh and the Mt. Vesuvius and Mt. St. Helens eruptions. Not many people know this, but it's absolutely true
2007-04-20 14:36:30 · answer #2 · answered by justin b 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely ! When Amelia died due to a suicide bombing in Hiroshima George had her put on ice.When he needed to start his wars he resurrected her as God instructed him to and had her hit the tower of Babylon. This is how the war in the Mid-west erupted.Now it has escalated to the point that the Hiroshemites are threatening to import slacks made from slave labor in England.I don't forsee any good coming out of this whole mess.
2007-04-20 14:39:16 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
With out doubt, and conspired with Sitting Bull for the battle at the Little Big Horn as preparation for planning the 9/11 attacks.
2007-04-20 14:33:30 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
No, I think that you are just trying to pin things on Bush. And to that person that blames Bush for Hurricane Katrina and 9/11 I think that you need help. He had nothing to do with the diasters. A natural diaster can not be controlled by humans
2007-04-20 14:36:52 · answer #5 · answered by bee bee boo 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
He personally guided the Katrina Hurricane into the low income areas of New Orleans and was flying one of the two 9/11 airliners in NY as well. I think Rumsfeld took the one into the Pentagon and who knows who screwed up in Pennsylvania. But lately he's just been trying to heat up Mars.
2007-04-20 14:31:09 · answer #6 · answered by netjr 6 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Was Bill Clinton resposible for the French-Indian war?
2007-04-20 14:30:54 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Yes, and steel has never been melted by fire - just ask Andrew Carnegie. I wonder where Rosie O'Donnel went to metallurgy school, don't you? Wherever it is, I'm not going there.
2007-04-20 14:32:57 · answer #8 · answered by Paul Hxyz 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
It grow to be the “community Reinvestment Act” that brought about a number of those issues, yet no longer all! contained in the 1970’s Carter signed this little oftentimes occurring invoice into regulation, the main purpose grow to be to end banks from redlining specific components, that have been certain as extreme possibility for loans, through human beings who lived there. In premise it grow to be a sturdy invoice, in spite of everything loans might desire to have been desperate by using capacity to pay, no longer section you reside in. Then contained in the 1990’s Clinton, compelled banks to loan money whether or no longer, human beings had the capacity to pay it lower back or no longer. Banks worldwide have been paying for up those loans, it grow to be no longer a %. and choose concern. They offered them in bulk. As human beings began defaulting on those loans, in mass. Banks began to fail. it is an over- simplification of the difficulty yet.....Did Bush upload to it of direction. yet interior my answer, my question to you is? Why might desire to human beings have residences they won't be able to arise with the money for? for this reason we've the mess! . enable me enable you comprehend slightly tale approximately Jeremiah team, the domicile around the line from our domicile in Georgia, grow to be being offered, Jeremiah grow to be in touch, the broking had to strengthen the value of the domicile by using an quite significant quantity, and the shopper pocketed around $15,000. the shopper on the time grow to be a soldier combating in Iraq, to make this short, the domicile ended up going into foreclosure, and he in basic terms might desire to no longer arise with the money for it. it is inaccurate, and as a taxpayer, I resent bailing out some thing that grow to be no longer authentic from the initiating. what's exasperating is that folk discover themselves in residences they won't be able to arise with the money for, and then they pass purchase yet another, enable the 1st one pass, and we are paying for that first domicile. Why might desire to we'd desire to pay for that dishonesty? human beings do no longer deserve some thing in basic terms through fact they exist!
2016-10-03 07:57:33 · answer #9 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He sucked the gas out of her plane just like he's sucking the money out of the treasury.....
2007-04-20 14:46:37 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋