Asked 4 days ago relating to friends in armaments and gun lobby
2007-04-20
12:34:30
·
5 answers
·
asked by
Serendipity
6
in
Politics & Government
➔ Law & Ethics
Funny how Yahoo didn't put it into militia this time. Thought Ans 15 + 4 (original Q) said it all - perhaps it's time the NRA dupes realised that 220 years on times have changed, or maybe guns should be used - not to "kill 2 times as many would-be killers as do police" (Ans 15) but, as originally suggested by the forefathers, to overthrow the government.
Spare us from gun-toting pedants (Ans 9) who shoots to hunt as well as defend (mind boggles!! racoons? rats? cockroaches? gnats? people of "wrong" colour/persuasion/habits?) - do you EAT the hunted or just compliment yourself on sneaking up on a placid deer perhaps with a multi-round assault weapon? I'm soooo UNimpressed.
2007-04-20
12:49:36 ·
update #1
Wow 1 and 2 you are fast!! I was searching for a way to add that this is more of a comment since I missed the chance on original Q to vote and that I am not looking for answers - though I'm sure there will be some and I even feel a thumbsdown on my answers coming on!
Have to disagree with Ans 1 while I'm here - surely this is a time if any - ask Reagan (not being snide honest) - he closed the needed institutions for mentally-ill who by virtue of their illness need supervision in at least medication control.
2007-04-20
12:56:59 ·
update #2
Hey sumting wong asshole - READ the whole question - to repeat - it's a comment.
2007-04-21
10:24:46 ·
update #3