2007-04-20 12:25:56 · 10 answers · asked by Ibredd 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
There was (not so long ago) laws against high risk behavior. That was before the sixties when the drugged up "if it feels good, do it" philosophy drowned out common sense and the Pied Pipers of Hollywood were allowed to elevate hedonism into a protected "special interest". In 1972 in Chicago there was a political gay rights plan to do just that and we see that so far it is working very effectively. Long before that there was a group that was written about in the Reader's Digest whose mantra was, "sex before eight or it's too late". They even had a mission statement describing their intent to infiltrate every organization and establishment, including churches, schools, legislatures, children's clubs, homes, etc.
I didn't even know about homosexuality until I was married and now it is a "political movement" that has infiltrated our government, our schools, our churches, legislatures, children's clubs homes and least but not last the pathetic derelicts that sleep on our streets.
Two family members (that we know of) has died of AIDS or "complications." Millions are infected world wide and It is estimated in the U. S. A. 250,000 people don't even they are infected. That's just HIV/AIDS. I've read that there are sixty-five million Americans infected with some kind of sexually transmitted disease. Yes, we do need tighter laws on high risk practices.
2007-04-20 15:23:04 · answer #1 · answered by WonderingWanderer 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
You ARE kidding, right? Who in hell would enforce that? Yeah, that is the cure for the ills of humanity...another law we'll just ignore anyway. Who defines what a risky practice is? How about personal responsibility? Gee, what a novel concept!
2007-04-20 19:30:35 · answer #2 · answered by Jay 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It would be a darned good idea. Gonorrhea is now a superbug because the antibiotics are no longer working. Perhaps we need to go back to the concept of purity.
2007-04-20 22:36:47 · answer #3 · answered by Brigid O' Somebody 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
We don't need tighter laws, we need to know when to get tested. I for one don't need the government to tell me who to f***.
2007-04-20 19:32:04 · answer #4 · answered by pctorab 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
sorry I have seen enough legislation passed "for the good of all" that is strangling the freedom in America--(smoking, cellphone usage, sodomy, banning fat/oils or such) it is called self control and personal responsibility--WEAR A CONDOM, do not have unprotected sex, be monogamous or stay celibate.
I AM RESPONSIBLE FOR MY ACTIONS AND CHOICES!!the US government can stay the F$%^ out of my bedroom and my medical records thank you.
2007-04-20 19:40:35 · answer #5 · answered by rwl_is_taken 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No. We need to make all those billions of condoms available to the general public. Especially youth.
2007-04-20 19:44:48 · answer #6 · answered by cyanne2ak 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
who needs a boyfriend when you've got a toy friend!
support sex toys fro teens to keep them abstenant!!!
this is not an add, but I think it's a good idea
2007-04-20 19:29:18 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Easy and illegal method: Quarantine all the people infected with AIDS.
2007-04-20 19:28:54 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
NO! we need to use or BRAINS!!!
Laws are not substitutes for brains!
2007-04-20 19:29:58 · answer #9 · answered by Ha! Invisible! 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
So then you are advocating teach sex ed in schools? Fabulous!
2007-04-20 19:28:39 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋