I have a degree in History specializing in the history of Science. During my studies I found that weaker scientists who are not great masters of their craft exhibited those traits you mentioned on several significant occasions.
They tend to sit on committee critiquing other scientist's work instead of doing their own work.
The history of science is very frustrating at times. Look at Galileo.
2007-04-20 07:21:36
·
answer #1
·
answered by huckster 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
As a scientist (retired professor...see my profile) I know I'm too smart to answer such a nonsense question from a commoner. If another scientist tries, I would not put any stock in his/her answer either. I don't wish to share my ideas with anyone else unless there is an ample reward for my efforts.
Seriously, all humans share these traits. I taught several classes in scientific inquiry and that is one of the topics we cover. Most students (from all majors) come in with that perception, but after several classes of lecture, debate, case studies, etc. they leave with the conclusion that scientists are just like anyone else in this respect. Other disciplines with similar attributes (which are also falsely proffered) include musicians, doctors, lawyers, artists, and children.
2007-04-20 11:04:37
·
answer #2
·
answered by Bruce D 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
You might need to further define what question you are trying to answer; "arrogance, jealousy, and selfishness" define MOST human beings! They are characteristics that have been bred into us (through the evolutionary process) because they actually offer advantages (though they also might offend!)
Think about it, "arrogance" is the only thing that keeps a hunter hunting until he kills lunch. On the face of it, it is ridiculous for him to believe he can catch & kill a beast big enough to feed his whole family.
Without jealousy, a mother might abandon her natural child and look for a "better one" to steal from someone else, and a father would not care what the mother did, threatening the realtively stable structure of a nuclear family.
And while it SOUNDS nice to be "selfless", selfishness is (at its root) the antithesis of "not caring at all", which would get us all nowhere, and fast!
2007-04-20 09:56:40
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
the main character of the present trilogy i'm engaged on is a womanizer even with no longer being that good-looking, he comes from an previous money kin and he's enthusiastic approximately enjoying polo. he's a late sleeper, eats too lots, likes to celebration and is a great pal. he's taking great thing approximately human beings lots, and the forged honest form of people at that, he's egocentric and has a great ego. He loves being the focal factor and making human beings sense stupid. he's loud, mindlessly courageous and he continually has a working plan and makes issues artwork for him and not any incorrect way around. he transformations in e book 3, tho. Oh, and he hates pretending to love somebody. He'd somewhat basically tell the guy why they suck and get it over with. He speaks his recommendations approximately human beings's personalities. He somewhat hates apples and beer. His famous band is 'The Hives'. he's taking showers a pair of circumstances an afternoon. His bestest pal interior the worldwide drowned in his pool :( i admire incorrect characters. Oh, God. i admire him lots :O i admire the writing existence.
2016-12-16 11:05:51
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
First off, How many scientists do you know? Arguably some would possess those qualities however it's more likely that most would have one of the specified qualities. Then again you see those traits in millions of people world-wide that aren't scientists, so I'm not exactly sure what your point is.
2007-04-20 07:14:27
·
answer #5
·
answered by jay k 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
Only in the sense that those are the normal character traits of most people.
2007-04-20 11:04:47
·
answer #6
·
answered by John R 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would say "most" is not a fair assessment.
But it is very common in science.
It seems the biggest "jerks" get all the attention and money. Mainly because they don't let anyone else talk.
Yes...I am a scientist. yes, i know what you are talking about.
You are not alone in your feelings.
2007-04-20 07:15:07
·
answer #7
·
answered by Captain Algae 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
some yes, some no. most of us are protective of our work, but not holding anything back from other researchers. some of us are cutthroat, but that's the level you have to be to work in certain fields.
2007-04-20 08:21:42
·
answer #8
·
answered by shiara_blade 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would say that not most but some
2007-04-20 11:36:33
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
to be totally honest No, no it is not.
At least no more than any other group of people, like say people living in the Bible belt.
2007-04-20 07:19:17
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋