English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I don't the understand the defense of Bush that goes "Clinton did it!". Yes he did and he was wrong. How does that absolve Bush? And of course the ancillary question is: why if one criticizes Bush is it automatically assumed that person was pro-Clinton?

2007-04-20 07:01:25 · 29 answers · asked by Studbolt Slickrock Deux 4 in Politics & Government Politics

29 answers

Man can some other family run for President in this life time.

2007-04-20 07:03:20 · answer #1 · answered by Laughing Man Copycat 5 · 6 1

THERE IS NO GREY AREA!!!
hahaha
George Bush is an idiot. Clinton was a different kind of idiot. However, until we get a president that can solve world hunger, global warming, national deficit, poverty, crashing job market, crashing real estate market and achieve peace on earth, there will never be a president that will be able to live up to anyone's standard. We put the weight of the world on these guys shoulders, some people handle it better than others, but as far as i'm concerned they all suck.

2007-04-20 07:18:24 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Both lied! The difference is; Clinton lied about getting a bj. and Monica is still alive!! Bush's lies caused many to die, a much more grave result as I see it. BTW, I was pro-Clinton and still am. I don't think he held a candle to John F. Kennedy though. That man got some REAL pu$$y!!!

2007-04-20 07:09:19 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

bill Clinton.He truly understood international politics,is an excellent political expertise who ought to even compromise paintings with a congress that replaced into completely anti him. He worked mutually nationally and around the international.He had integrity,honesty perception and expertise contained in the way he lead u . s . a ..He tried to imagine what his rules ought to do to instantly ahead human beings to boot as lengthy favourite international allies comparing George W Bush as a president to bill Clinton is extremely corresponding to comparing Vanilla Ice to Tupac.Bush is not any adventure and not in any respect even a real challenge

2016-12-04 09:08:49 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Feel free to criticize both. If you are thinking WMD's as Bush's lie I don't think it was a lie. I think he was wrong but I don't think he knew he was wrong when he said it - which is required for it to be a lie.

I don't really care about criticizing either of them. I want to make note of what works and what doesn't. I don't care who the president is or his party.

2007-04-20 07:06:15 · answer #5 · answered by sfavorite711 4 · 2 0

Ya I hate them both as well, clinton sold us out to China and Vietnam, a lying degenerate; Bush warmongering.

2007-04-20 07:28:01 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Damn right! But people are so used to this Dem/Rep duopoly that we have in this country that they automatically assume criticism of one party equals support for the other.

2007-04-20 07:10:49 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Of course. They ARE both liars. That's why Papa Bush treats Billy Boy like a son. Nice little family of Neo-Con-Men.
.....

2007-04-20 07:07:28 · answer #8 · answered by ladykofnyc 3 · 1 1

After learning more about what Clinton did (secret deals with China), I now respect Bush more.


Can Any Liberals Explain Why Clinton Sold Out To China?
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AufYSdmmzu8b6dWhL6pLabcjzKIX?qid=20070223211146AAK87ii

Missile Technology Sent To China
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/836496/posts

Clinton and Chinese Missiles
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2003/1/14/143258.shtml

"A U.S. high-tech firm bought in 1995 with Clinton-administration approval by a consortium that included two Chinese companies is proving to be a threat to U.S. national security, according to senior government analysts" http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1571/is_40_18/ai_94511263

CHINA EXPORTING MISSILE TECHNOLOGY TO IRAN
7/17/99: According to a CIA report to Congress, China is continuing to supply advanced conventional arms to Iran. "China also was an important supplier of advanced conventional weapons to Iran through the second half of 1998..."http://www.nti.org/db/China/miranchr.htm

China Arms the Rogues
"It was only in early June 1997, however, that the State Department formally notified Congress that China had sold cruise missiles to Iran, "enhancing that country's ability to disrupt Persian Gulf shipping and challenge U.S. forces in the region."5 Such transfers would violate the Missile Technology Control Regime (MTCR), a voluntary supplier arrangement, and would warrant U.S. sanctions under 1990, 1991, and 1994 amendments to the Arms Export Control Act. No such action has been taken, however, as of this writing.""Middle East Quarterly September 1997 http://www.meforum.org/article/360

Book : "The Coming Conflict With China" (1997). ""When Secretary of State Warren Christopher visited Beijing in mid-March 1994, the Chinese subjected him to such humiliating treatment in private meeting....""

Book: "Unrestricted Warfare: China's Master Plan to Destroy America " (2002)

2007-04-20 07:06:23 · answer #9 · answered by a bush family member 7 · 3 2

You and I both know that you have a right to critize both men. They are politicians, they all lie, it's just the way it is. Tough luck.

2007-04-20 07:04:50 · answer #10 · answered by Alexis 3 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers