with the 5-4 vote on partial birth abortion libs can't do this anymore for campaign contributions.How can anybody crack the heads of babies and while hearing them scream...vacuum their brains before pulling the carcass out of the grieving mother?Is this a satanic ritual?How did people come up with this naziesque proceedure?
2007-04-20 06:36:55 · 14 answers · asked by killa d 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
I haven't read the ruling yet.
I always seem to read these kind of posts at lunchtime.
2007-04-20 07:02:23 · answer #1 · answered by American citizen and taxpayer 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You've obviously been overwhelmed by the wrong information. Do some research. Late Term Abortions, as the Repubs like to call them, are 2 tenths of 1% (that's .017%) of all abortions. And are almost 100% performed only because of health concerns of the woman. These are not elective procedures. these are not any form of birth control at all. The ban that was upheld by the supreme court DID NOT give any option for the physician to perform this procedure if the womans life was at risk.
2007-04-20 17:35:34 · answer #2 · answered by ndmagicman 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I am sick of anti-choice activists who think that liberals enjoy, relish, or otherwise approve of abortion. It is a horrible choice to have to make, but what the conservatives fail to understand is that if we remove the legal option to give abortions, then it will continue to be done illegaly and very unsafely.
Doctors were imprisoned in the 40s and 50s for discussing birth control because it was thought it would encourage sex. No one needs to encourage sex-that happens instinctively.
I am made ill by the idea of abortion, but I refuse to live in a country where the law forbids it and women who cannot afford to be pregnant are required to seek out illegal doctors who are not regulated and could potentially kill them.
Go read the Cider House Rules (don't watch the movie) and ask yourself if it's better to abort a late -term pregnancy or allow the mother to die in childbirth due to inevitable complications.
2007-04-20 13:46:33 · answer #3 · answered by Year of the Monkey 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
No woman would elect to do a partial birth abortion. It was only done in dire circumstances when the child was extremely deformed with an encephlatic head (very large) that would harm the mother to deliver it and would render her impossible to have future children.
It was used by the republican leadership as a political issue designed to inflame and divide the country.
2007-04-20 13:45:51 · answer #4 · answered by SueB 3 · 2⤊ 3⤋
A baby is'nt a baby, til the day it's born. There should be as many abortion clinics as there are Starbucks, or 7-Elevens.
2007-04-20 15:13:16 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Sex without consequences is what it's all about!!! It's not completely about a woman's right to choose - I think Planned Parenthood and other 'pro-choice' agencies enjoy killing babies! They even promote it on their web site. Go check it out and you'll see what I mean.
www.plannedparenthood.org
2007-04-20 13:46:25 · answer #6 · answered by higherlovetx 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Since I don't feel like repeating what other's have said,
I'm throwing in with Year of the Monkey, Ken Eretsu, and Cheyenne's answers. I agree with all of them.
2007-04-20 13:55:32 · answer #7 · answered by Humanist 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Any reasonable person would agree that this practice is not the best.
The fact remains that abortions will continue and they should be available and safe.
2007-04-20 13:47:32 · answer #8 · answered by ken erestu 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Do you even know what abortion is?
2014-01-10 00:25:39 · answer #9 · answered by Claire 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
of course they are! now they cant use abortion as a birth control anymore. Now they are force to be responsible while having sex, amazing concept huh guys?
2007-04-20 13:42:01 · answer #10 · answered by scotty 2 · 2⤊ 4⤋