My bf's not circumcised and it's just great. He takes very good care of his squeaky.
2007-04-20 06:30:12
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
You won't have to worry about getting a girls because no one will go out with someone who can't speak and spell correctly.
Circumcision is by choice. It's neither safer or "more fun"--- either way. The only benefit is that it is easier for the man to keep clean.
2007-04-20 13:23:34
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
"Menes"?
Oh yeah. You're a fountain of knowledge.
I doubt you are talking about Menes the king of Egypt.
.
2007-04-20 13:27:33
·
answer #3
·
answered by NoahTall 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
no, It does not make a difference, the only thing is you should be cleaner, or you can get infections, if you don't clean enough you might get a pretty nasty smell,
oh and jewish people go to hell if they are uncircumcised.
and no, it makes it more sensitive to touch when you are not circumcised, because it is always protected, as for the other way it will rub on underwear and stuff
2007-04-20 13:24:58
·
answer #4
·
answered by gtamayo1 4
·
1⤊
2⤋
When it comes to sex, you can't even tell the difference so it's not more fun necessarily. And as long as the man keeps clean, it's not necessarily safer either.
I don't care one way or the other.
2007-04-20 13:23:18
·
answer #5
·
answered by Nasubi 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Its more sanitary when a guy is circumcised.
I think it looks better to.
I had both my sons circumcised at birth.
I also heard it makes it more sensitive to the touch when it is.
2007-04-20 13:22:46
·
answer #6
·
answered by wigglemommyof3 3
·
2⤊
1⤋
I assume u r Un? Maybe due to Your Heritage/Tribe/Faith...?
As for mine they are~
2007-04-20 13:31:17
·
answer #7
·
answered by reseda1420 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
what?
2007-04-20 13:23:18
·
answer #8
·
answered by HoyaDoc 4
·
1⤊
1⤋