Terrorist murder people all the time in order to intimidate, increase their power, and impose their will. They try to start wars and aggravate tense situations. However, liberals seem to give them a pass. Do liberals actually admire religious fundamentalism because they secretly have the need to be controlled by "God" also.? Liberals tend to be conformist like the fundamentalist also.....they cannot tolerate anyone who dares to express alternate views..what do you think?
2007-04-20 06:10:47 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
If liberals are not conformist why are you cursing me and getting so mad because I stated a question that made you uncomfortable.?
2007-04-20 06:42:52 · update #1
I think you've got them confused with conservatives.
2007-04-20 06:13:23 · answer #1 · answered by T S 5 · 7⤊ 7⤋
I am a "Liberal" who has respect for other people's opinions.I may not agree but that doesn't mean their opinion is invalid to them.I have even stated on here several times I may vote Republican in the next electiion if the right person makes it past the primaries.And personally I think you are a contradiction to your beliefs.You are the one with a mindset against people not me.So can you tolerate an alternate view?
2007-04-20 06:29:07 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Where did you come up with this??? In one breath *you people* want to say that "liberals" are godless baby killers.... in the other breath you squeeze out that they are all about religious fundamentalism!!!!
You don't even know what you are talking about. You're just spewing random crap for the sheer sake of being an a$$hole.
If anything as you guys like to say, liberals are too sissy and sensitive to admire killing of any kind!!! Isn't that why you hate liberals?? Because they are sissy stinky hippies????
You're the one screaming for comformism assuming that "if you aren't with us you're with the terrorists"
Go get a reality check Bozo!
2007-04-20 06:17:49 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
it incredibly is. Any wanton destruction civilian existence is terrorism. The U.S. "sanctions" against Iraq led to 0.5 one million lives,for the main area toddlers and teenagers. for sure it extremely is terorism. It was called "state terorism" as unfavorable to NGO terrorism or guerilla war because it replaced into previously everyday. because of the fact the mass media comes increasingly extra below jewish possession the term,even the assumption of state terrorism has vanished. yet that would not recommend human beings can't think of for themselves. i'm an American and that i understand completely nicely what's happening. and that i do what i can,consisting of public screening of documentaries on the Palestinians and leafletting. Plus,my artwork right here on R&S which reaches lots of individuals. i'm purely somebody and those efforts might seem paltry yet I have not have been given from now on very own capacity than any non-place of work-holder.
2016-10-28 13:32:32 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Your question is so b*tt-backwards I don't know where to start.
What "liberal" have you heard saying he/she admires terrorists? Or was that something Ann Coulter told you a liberal said?
In case you're that uninformed, religious fundamentalists support THE REPUBLICAN PARTY.
Liberal, by its textbook definition means "open-minded and tolerant", which is the exact opposite of supporting conformity.
Please, do yourself a favor and learn to think for yourself and not just unquestioningly believe what Fox News and rightwing radio hosts tell you.
2007-04-20 06:19:21 · answer #5 · answered by Maggiecat 3 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Um i think your nuts, Define liberal smart ***! liberal/ democratic people are not the god lovers its u republicans that think you can control everything, the only difference is the way things are handle we do not give them a pass, u give them no choice! We wont leave so they will slowly find ways of killing us off. Re think your statements before u start pointing the finger!!!!!!!!!
2007-04-20 06:16:54 · answer #6 · answered by Sunshine 2 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I can't speak for liberals, but I can explain why "progressives" admire terrorists.
Because a terrorist is willing to do what a progressive is not.
They are willing to die to bring down western civilization.
The progressive wants the same thing, but they are unwilling to do more than burn the occasional soldier-in-effigy.
They are chickenhawks.
(In other words, you are asking your question about the wrong sort of people. Liberals are liberals, and they are as American as anyone else. "Progressives" are international socialists, sometimes swimming in the sea that American liberalism.)
2007-04-20 06:15:59 · answer #7 · answered by A Balrog of Morgoth 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Looks like somebody's had
too much of Bushie's Jesus Juice
this morning! Better cut back...its
killing your brain cells...
How come Fox is playing Cho's tape
over & over & over & over...
Does that mean the Republicans love
terrorists who kill innocent civilians?
Oh wait...they lust for Iraqi blood...
Nevermind....
2007-04-20 06:19:18 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
This question could not be more idiotic. Liberals do not love terrorists. I'm not a liberal first of all. But I really hate this sort of demonizing that has no basis in fact. It's this sort of trash that is turning people against the Republican Party. Congratulations.
2007-04-20 06:14:29 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 10⤊ 2⤋
Libs tend not to "admire" terrorists, but they certainly have emboldened them.
Imagine... 1943 and congress set a time table for withdraw from Europe. Hitler, Goebels, Himmler would be high fiving each other and we'd be speaking German.
Nevill Chamberlain was wrong then and so is Hillarry, Dean, Kennedy and the rest now.
2007-04-20 06:28:40 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 5⤋
It all ties into their socialist perspective that everybody needs to be brought up to the same level and since america is the most powerful nation they play to the cause of third world countries. Same thing goes on here in that the 'white man' needs to be taken out of power and the theory of diversity prevails no matter what.
2007-04-20 06:20:39 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 4⤋