English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

how can evolution explain living animals like stick worm or kameleon . evolution says that everything is a coincidence but how coincidence "invent" such kind of animals.
there is said that animals (and plants of course too) are "made" according to environment.
and this is made by "natural selection".
let's go to the example .
as a example of evolution there is often shown a kind of butterfly which has changed wing color from white to black, because tries or something became dark because of industrial development.
and butteflies need to hide from "bad animals" .
so..
in normal environment there would be black or other colour butterflies but they did survive and did not hug with other butterfly strongly in bed. I think natural selection is too simple world is much more comlicated than :
"if has fat buttock will survive and when has not will not "
I hope you will understand what I want to say...
I am afraid I wouldn't haha....
but I wanna say something though my language capa

2007-04-20 05:10:37 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Science & Mathematics Biology

9 answers

It's not quite that simple. Natural selection is a concept that states that organisms which are better able to exploit their environment will be more likely to survive and therefore pass on their genetic pattern, eventually becoming the dominant species in their niche. Over millions of years, many minor mutations will "stack up", creating very specialized organisms within a particular niche. A chameleon that is better able to manipulate its chromatophores is more likely to be able to hide from predators, therefore surviving longer and having more offspring.

Natural selection can eventually lead to speciation, especially in isolated populations, when stacked mutations alter an organism from its root species so much that they can no longer interbreed. Both of these concepts have been observed and documented in the wild.

2007-04-20 05:23:23 · answer #1 · answered by JLynes 5 · 1 0

It is not chance as you know it. What happens is, within any species, there is variation. Some of the members have genes that others don't have. These genes could have arisen by random mutation, mutation due to environmental factors, or mutation due to a virus.

There is an ability to change.

Consider a population of bees. Bees don't do well in the cold. If the temperature of the Earth were slowly dropping, we may see many bees die off as a result of this. Some will survive. If this survival is based on certain genes that can be passed on, the next generation of bees may inherite this tolerance to colder weather.

The ancestors of the stick bug had a gene pool that caused some of the bugs to stand out less from their background. These bugs were a little more protected from predators and produced more offspring with similar traits.

Over time this trait became enhanced, producing modern stick bugs.

2007-04-21 07:45:26 · answer #2 · answered by minuteblue 6 · 0 0

Evolution doesn't state that everything is "coincidence" and nothing is "INVENTED" it is already in the species gene pool.

Butterflies don't "change" the color of their wings, what happens is that the dark ones had a higher survival rate cause they were less evident to predators, and so, the dark-winged trait became a "favorable" one and because the survival rate in this butterflies was higher the population became higher than the white-winged ones...

We share 99% of our genes with chimpanzees and 94% with macaques, how would your theory explain this? (you don't mention how you believe animals were "made")

You should try and understand better before critizicing anything.

2007-04-20 07:10:30 · answer #3 · answered by Belisa 3 · 1 0

You are misunderstanding about the butterflies. If soot turns trees black, the birds can easily see and eat the yellow butterflies. So, what happens is there are no yellow butterflies for the black ones to hug. They were mostly all eaten up.

This would not have happened overnight. The darker the shade of an individual butterflies wings, the better chance it would have to survive while the birds caught and ate the ones with lighter colored wings. Thus more and more dark winged butterflies to have babies and the fewer light winged ones reproducing.

2007-04-20 06:40:45 · answer #4 · answered by Joan H 6 · 1 0

Evolution is not a truth or law, it is a theory, one that is supported by fact and observation.

You state above that the evolution is a coincidence, but it actually has to do with the mutations of animals to allow them to better survive in the wild, through a process called "Natural Selection". In brief, that means that if an animal mutates, and that mutation allows them a better chance of survival (e.g. can allow them to run faster, survive longer without food), then that mutation will be passed onto further generations.

2007-04-20 05:20:35 · answer #5 · answered by Big Super 6 · 1 1

we're right here for God and to compliment God and worship God no longer for ourselves if you're christian. This sentence is correct. I feel your center is correct, however you have got been inaccurate. The booklet of Romans tells us: "And don't be conformed to this international, however be converted by way of the renewing of your brain, so that you would be able to turn out what the desire of God is, that that is well and appropriate and superb". That does not imply that we're to wholly separate ourselves from the arena. If we had been to do away with the whole lot that factors us to sin, we might have got to pluck out our eyes and our tongue (the deadliest weapon incidentally). I am a Christian lady and our household does not watch so much t.v. however that is not the factor rather. I feel as Christians, in WHATEVER we do, whether or not it's the t.v. exhibit we're looking, the tune we're listeing to, the conversations we're having, the THOUGHTS we're having, we have got to ask ourselves this: (from Philipians) Is this actual, is that this honorable, is that this correct, is that this natural, is that this beautiful, is that this of well popularity, is there any is excellence on this, is it important of compliment? Those are the matters we must be "residing" on. I ask myself the ones matters most commonly, and if the reply is "no", I make a difference. There are temptations throughout us, and there'll continually be. We have got to be in prayer and within the Word every day so our minds will likely be ever converted to God's will, no longer our possess. About the lengthy hair, I am guessing you're speakme approximately the scripture wherein a person cannot get dressed as a lady? Well, the lengthy/quick hair factor is beautiful purpose. I in my view do not like lengthy hair on a man, however I do NOT feel this can be a sin. That's loopy. During biblical instances, guys had lengthy hair, adding Jesus I am certain. The simplest limits I learn approximately within the Bible in the case of private grooming are that we're to be modest. That has not anything to do with our hair! Good grief! There is not anything improper with dwelling just like the Amish (I have satisfactory recognize for them), but it surely IS improper and IS sinful to pass judgement on others. It appears like you're judging your brothers and sisters in Christ simply for the reason that they don't seem to be going gung-ho approximately eliminating their t.v.'s. Don't allow any one twist the reality of scripture. I do not feel humans are ever indignant by way of the reality - they're indignant by way of lack of expertise. I wish this helped.

2016-09-05 18:14:31 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

It is okay to disagree with natural selection. I don't care what you want to believe in. Everybody used to think that the world was flat and that it was the center of the universe. That didn't make them right.

2007-04-20 05:48:52 · answer #7 · answered by Franklin 7 · 3 0

The original idea of evolution was a hoax cooked up by Darwin himself. The original idea holds no water what so ever. But like any evil church, over the years the truth has been buried and the craftiness of men has been used to blind the dumb.
http://www.evolutiondeceit.com/chapter9.php

2007-04-22 08:13:04 · answer #8 · answered by J D 2 · 0 1

It's OK to disagree with natural selection. I disagree with it too. You can't make living creatures by selecting for only one thing at a time, which is all natural selection can do. For more information, see www.evolvedself.com/about/natselchallenge.htm

2007-04-20 05:26:03 · answer #9 · answered by shauncats 1 · 0 4

fedest.com, questions and answers