Do the liberals actually have a legitimate agenda?
2007-04-20 04:45:22 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
THEY'RE WAITING FOR ROSIE AND ALEX BALDWIN TO
GIVE THEM FURTHER MARCHING ORDERS!
2007-04-20 11:12:38 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I've never heard any liberal advocate killing babies and how are liberals undermining our troops?
The legitimate liberal agenda is to fix the healthcare system, fix the education system, put environmental protection back in place, try and work on the deficit spending that is out of control.
Fix the debacle of a war we have going on.
Does Bush have a legitimate agenda? I haven't seen it and it's been 6 years.
2007-04-20 04:51:52 · answer #2 · answered by Diggy 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
This is not a surprise. The fact that Saudi Arabia is a major source of fighters has been reported for quite some time. I have not heard of the Libyan connection before. Considering the close ties the Saudi's have to the Bush regime and the recent contracts given Halliburton for development in Libya and the Carlyle groups role in providing capital for development of the oil industry in Libya is it any wonder that they are not amonst the 'evil ones' ?
2016-05-19 21:46:53 · answer #3 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Praytell us then what is the conservative agenda? They obviously didn't have one for Iraq. I'm not sure what babies you are referring to. We are trying to keep a womans right to choose, still her right, get it? I've said it many times, but obviously most of you conservatives walk around with your heads up your collective butts. You say it's a baby, others feel differently, get that through you thick skull. Since the supreme court has not ruled on when life begins, I guess you're just gonna have a big cup of shut the hell up. If you don't believe in abortion, don't have one.
How funny. You disapprove of abortion but you advocate men, women and children losing life an limb in Iraq.
2007-04-20 04:52:14 · answer #4 · answered by Spirish_1 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
i love how going against a WRONGLY WAGED war means undermining troops when many of them don't want to be there or believe in the war themselves. Many of my brothers friends and people I graduated have served in Iraq and don't agree with the war and have NO PROBLEM with people protesting...they don't like see their friends killed and their lives on the line for no reason either.
2007-04-20 04:52:47 · answer #5 · answered by good2bayanksfan 2 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Hell yes we undermine the war, I dont think were underimining our troops unless you count getting them home with all their legs and arms as undermining them. Or do you want them to stay and die in some filthly godless hell hole? HMMM?
2007-04-20 04:52:25 · answer #6 · answered by khorrl 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
How about upholding a womans right to choose? And what is so wrong on not wanting to see anymore troops die? You obviously aren't close to anyone in the military. If you are, shame on you. I would rather have my friends and family here in the US. Will you take their place instead?
2007-04-20 04:52:04 · answer #7 · answered by Nunnya 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Yes, we are going to rule the world!!!! Just kidding, but really being baby killers is what we do best.
Sorry you ask a stupid question, you get a stupid answer.
2007-04-20 04:53:05 · answer #8 · answered by Global warming ain't cool 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Hating Bush is the only agenda they have.
2007-04-20 04:53:15 · answer #9 · answered by mbush40 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
I don't advocate killing babies, although I would have made an exception in your case. Here's a clue....you don't have to follow everything your party stands for... unlike people like you, who would support Bush if he took a sh*t on the constitution
2007-04-20 04:50:21 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 4⤋
Libs are going to be lost when Bush is out of office.
Then, they'll actually have to put up or shut up.
2007-04-20 04:54:04 · answer #11 · answered by ? 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋