Where was the outrage and grief when the Government shot to death, with firearms, four innocent students?
How come CNN did not call for banning fire arms then?
So according to CNN it is not okay for Cho Cho to use a gun and kill students, but it is okay for the Governemnt to use guns to kill students?
2007-04-20 04:40:52 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Media & Journalism
doh! !!!!!!!!
2007-04-20 04:48:23 · update #1
Good question. Kent State came to my mind the other day.... I was younger (ha), but, at the time, I was stunned that such could/did happen. Things were entirely out of control here in the states.
At that time, the govt. did what it could. No laws were broken. Lives were lost - though. Excellent point.
2007-04-20 04:59:43 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you are talking about the Kent State shootings, that happened in 1970 and there was a lot of protest about it.
However, that shooting was provoked by the violent behavior of the students; even if it was not justified, it wasn't wanton or senseless; it arose out of the situation.
2007-04-20 11:52:55 · answer #2 · answered by The First Dragon 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
OK well i go to Kent State, and its funny because the students that were shot and killed were not protesting, they were walking to class.. interesting thought
2007-04-20 12:47:54 · answer #3 · answered by Ms. Lady 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
What happened in Ohio? What town?
2007-04-20 11:44:40 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
priority.............protesting students are fair game if the govt officials feel a threat..........where were the police during the 2 hours between the shootings at VT?
2007-04-20 11:44:40 · answer #5 · answered by alex grant 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Cause these kids weren't punks
2007-04-20 11:43:41 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋