You know it will. We can't seem to change their nature. They seem to want to blow something up just because they have a protest about ANYTHING. I don't mean all of them. Just the ones who do it.
How did they get here last time Argle?
2007-04-20 04:14:01
·
answer #1
·
answered by madbaldscotsman 6
·
1⤊
3⤋
How many of the 9/11 hijackers were from Iraq?
(None).
How many international terrorists were in Iraq in 2003?
(One. And Saddam Hussein executed Abu Nidal).
What the hell are we doing in Iraq?
(Fomenting terrorism. There have been more acts of international terrorism committed by Iraqis between 2003 and 2007 than there had been between 1983 and 2003.)
It this unprovoked war had been waged by a competent administration, it is possible we might actually have done something good in Iraq. So far, all we have to show for the 60,000 slaughtered Iraqi civilians is the arousal of international animosity against us.
Yes, we were attacked on 9/11. By Saudi Arabs who received terrorist training in Afghanistan. Our initial response was measured and appropriate and enjoyed international support--we attacked Afghanistan. Then, somehow, we got all confused and misdirected, and attacked Iraq. There was no Al Queda in Iraq prior to our invasion. They are a growing presence there now, and what we are doing creates terrorists trained and dedicated to attacking us.
It is probably only a matter of time before there is a terrorist incident sponsored by Iraqis in our country. There NEVER was before.
2007-04-20 11:41:07
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Considering that Iraq never attacked us in the first place I think it is doubtful. We need to go after Al Qaida, not the Iraqis. This war is not about attacking a country, it is about attacking an idea. You do that better with intelligence and good police work. Right now we are trying to swat a fly with a baseball bat. Taking the troops out of Iraq will not change the way that Al Qaida feels about us, in fact, staying there only helps to recruit more terrorists.
2007-04-20 11:17:45
·
answer #3
·
answered by diogenese_97 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
Your logic is backwards.
The terrorism will continue and spread UNTIL we withdraw our forces entirely from the middle east.
Consider what the actions of this country would be if the Iranian military invaded and occupied this country. How long would you continue to fight through whatever means available?
Anybody remember the movie "Red Dawn"? Remember how proud you felt that Americans waged a terrorist war?
Why do Americans feel as though the Arabs have no right to feel that way?
2007-04-20 11:19:53
·
answer #4
·
answered by lunatic 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
I totally supported this answer !! i have nothing to say other than this"No, I don't think so. Fighting in Iraq isn't preventing terrorism here. If someone decided to come here tomorrow and commit a terrorist act, he or she would have the same chance of success whether our troops are fighting in Iraq or not.
Preventing terrorism at home is up to our domestic national security efforts, not fighting wars in Third World countries. "
2007-04-20 11:17:12
·
answer #5
·
answered by yepyep 1
·
1⤊
1⤋
No, I don't think so. Fighting in Iraq isn't preventing terrorism here. If someone decided to come here tomorrow and commit a terrorist act, he or she would have the same chance of success whether our troops are fighting in Iraq or not.
Preventing terrorism at home is up to our domestic national security efforts, not fighting wars in Third World countries.
2007-04-20 11:14:42
·
answer #6
·
answered by Bush Invented the Google 6
·
6⤊
1⤋
There were never any terriost here. Bin ladin was a patsy--just like the American people are now under neo-CON rule.
Why do you think bush read a goat book for 20 mins as America burned?
I mean bush IS STUPID---cant you see what hes doing? There was never a terriost. Have you ever googled' jose padilla pic + ok city bomber'
With a little looking--the bushbunch become clear- you CAN see through their toilet water.
2007-04-20 11:22:54
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Irak and afghanistan are not the main sources of terrorism, instead of spending all that money and lives, all those resources should be used to track and eliminate those large enterprises of terrorism, which by the way could be even american terrorists, colombian drug cartels, mid-western, asian among many others, those are the ones that are going to be a pain in the butt later on.
2007-04-20 11:17:29
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
No because we only went there for the oil. We got saddam out why are we still there . Reason the oil. I am tired of hearing about the terriost ****. If we never would of went into that country ,we wouldn't be hearing about these so called people. This is such bullshit , we spend billions of tax payers dollar and all so are president and the oil companie can get there oil and charge us higher gas prices. I am so ******* tired of hearing weapons of mass destruction there are no ******* weapons of mass destruction are some people so ******* stupid they believe everything there told. They they charge us for this ******* stolen oil ,its such bullshit. Everyone knows it ,but no one has the balls to say this war in iraq had no ******* purpose but to get rid of saddam and still the oil from iraq. I believe in war but not one that makes people pay higher gas prices and lie about weapons which don't exist. If you like being someones puppet and someones ***** then by all means believe ever thing the president says he lies ever time he talks. Then when he answers you can tell he is lying by the expression on his face. I am sorry to offend some people,but don't you think it time to face the facts and the truth. One last time no such thing as ******* weapon of mass destuction. Only reason is oil. And now the president want to go to Iran why because they have oil too. Takes one person to lie and others to be gullible.
2007-04-20 11:25:29
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
No, that is a myth. If we seal the borders like I want to , there will never be another terrorist act in America. Withdrawal is the best thing to do, it will save lives.
2007-04-20 11:15:19
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
I don't think that will happen. The state of civil war will increase rapidly, and they will be to busy fighting for control over the country to bother with us.
2007-04-20 11:15:50
·
answer #11
·
answered by evil_paul 4
·
0⤊
1⤋