2007-04-20 03:38:46 · 36 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I think the mediator of the debate would commit suicide.
2007-04-20 03:41:54 · answer #1 · answered by Bryan H 3 · 14⤊ 1⤋
properly whether that's a conflict of witt you're speaking approximately Ann Coulter might win hands down. whether that's a conflict of elegance it may well be Coulter returned. In an incredibly phisical confontation Rosie out weighs Coulter by potential of plenty and might for useful have the better hand.
2016-10-13 00:59:02 · answer #2 · answered by lints 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ann Coulter would win in any sort of intelligent debate. Rosie is a monosynaptic, self-important idiot. Rosie may even be mentally ill, she clearly has paranoid thought processes. I don't say that to be mean, but just as an observation.
2007-04-20 03:54:30 · answer #3 · answered by greengo 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Rosie would have to stop bleating and lowing long enough for there to be an intelligent exchange.
But Ann Coulter, of course. Ann is extemely intelligent and smart while Rosie is a mean-spirited liberal troll
2007-04-20 03:53:03 · answer #4 · answered by 4 Shades of Blue 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
That should be on pay per view.
Rosie is an ugly intellectual idiot.
Miss Coulter is an intellectual beauty.
Would be fun to watch, like any sporting event. Rosie wouldn't have a chance and she knows it. I'll bet the beasts on that show would refuse to have Coulter on. (of course I'm not talking about the lovable and beautiful Elizabeth, the anti Rosie)
2007-04-20 03:50:52 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
Ann Coulter would win. Rosie doesn't have the political knowledge she trys to put off.. She has admitted she responds out of emotion of the moment. Ann is a intelligent woman regardless of how people feel about her, she knows her stuff.
2007-04-20 03:47:39 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 3⤋
That would be a completely unfair debate. Ann really is about 2000% smarter than Rosie.
Just read Ann Coulters books, you will see why. OR do a search on youtube, she has wit and charm, and is overflowing with charisma and confidence.
Rosie is just a mean spirited shouter. Lot's of opinions, nothing to back it up.
2007-04-20 03:47:08 · answer #7 · answered by smatthies65 4 · 4⤊ 4⤋
Ann would win. Rosie isn't very good at lobbing personal attacks, which is Ann's area of expertise. Ann would have dismantled Rosie before they even got to the actual issue being debated.
Remember, Rosie was called "The Queen of Nice" when she had her own show, and despite the occasional sound clip, she tends to maintain that standard of behavior on "The View."
Rosie just doesn't have the raw anger, psychosis or soulless hatred of humanity that drives Cuolter.
Of course, neither of them are very good about fact checking or research, so that won't even come into play. Some folks think Coulter has more facts on her side, but the reality is Coulter is just good at punching the same little tidbit, regardless of the fact that most of the time, she made it up.
Neither of them is very good at real debating. Coulter just yells the other person down and launches personal attacks, but I suppose today's undereducated public thinks being the one to scream louder makes you the better debater.
2007-04-20 03:45:22 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 6⤋
Coulter has more experience at spewing the venomous hate than O'Donnell. Personally I don't like either one of them and the fight would pit one idiot against another. In the end merely because of experience I would give it to Coulter.
2007-04-20 03:54:58 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Unfortunately, nobody would. Rosie would keep interrupting Ann, Ann would get fed up, it would turn physical. With no debate winner.
2007-04-20 03:42:48 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
Rosie would never let Ann get a word in.
2007-04-20 03:42:49 · answer #11 · answered by az 4 · 8⤊ 2⤋