Your opinions on this:?

Question

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8141887480656996234

And this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BPL1G__N1l0

And this:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=165664626072265496

Answer 1

My opinion is that I have better things to do than watch long videos to find out what your question actually is. Why not summarise what specifically you want to ask about from those videos and just ask the question.

Answer 2

Disputing science is a lame excuse for not learning it. Not one word of this is science. Trying to make science and history fit the Bible is like trying to put Rosanne Barr in a bikini. Even if you are able to do it, it just won't be right. Any religion that puts true knowledge on the back burner just has to be the work of Satan.

Answer 3

I watched about the first 5 seconds of each. It's all crap.

Added: We do not estimate the age of the earth by carbon dating. The half life is too short. We use uranium dating which works much better over billions of years.

Answer 4

Here is my response to it. It is kinda of long (~5 mins) but if you let it buffer you can just move down to the last 30 seconds

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NBZQfAYfH7s

Answer 5

The references to time passage in Genesis are unsubstantiated and unprovable. Life by God's supposed creation. People living to be 400, 300. LIfespans lessened as time went on.

Also, Time for creatures to evolve, and of course carbon dating IS what it is. Ultimately, its science versus the conjurings of "the Bible". Also, there were no mentionings in any other text of such a limited time frame for time passage to Mankind being 6000 years.

The references in "the Bible" are obscure at best, while carbon dating is very accurate. Its faith versus science. Will it ever be resolved? Dunno...........