English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I walk about 1.6m/ 2.5km to work in the morning and I'd walk quite briskly to get the most out of it. I'm thinking about getting a bike for the journey and was wondering which of the two would burn off the most calories in the trip.

Thanks

2007-04-19 22:30:52 · 18 answers · asked by Velocityboy 1 in Health Diet & Fitness

18 answers

walking i think.

2007-04-19 22:35:11 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

It depends.

Mostly on the intensity! That is the key factor.

All that said:
Get the bike, and then walk briskly to work some days, and ride others. You can also use the bike for other trips; longer distances, enjoy fun rides, and get some intensity out of riding the bike longer. This will add variety to your exercise and make it more enjoyable.

2007-04-19 23:53:38 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

if you cycle to work you will get there a lot quicker and exercise for less time. if the way is flat it is not going to take much effort and therefore burn few calories. walking can intensify your exercise by power walking. cycling on average burns 5 calories per minute and power walking 10 calories.

2007-04-23 05:26:20 · answer #3 · answered by Dolly 6 · 0 0

My estimation is just that, correct me where I'm wrong. I'd guess walking 1.6 miles would take around 20 minutes, which for me weighing 154lb/11stone would burn 108 calories.

Cycling 1.6 miles will take less, I'm going to halve 20 as a fair guess and say it'd take ten minutes, cycling at a slow pace would been 98 calories.

Of course all are approximations. Cycling is going to impact your legs more than walking would, and you could expect to see more leg definition and muscle.

---
Race for Life
http://www.raceforlifesponsorme.org/ourpath

2007-04-20 00:57:47 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Cycling

2007-04-19 22:37:13 · answer #5 · answered by Kerching!!! 1 · 0 0

Cycling, you would have to walk at quite a pace to burn off what you would burn using a bike.

2007-04-19 22:34:44 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Cycling is better as you can go at a faster pace therefore burning more calories.

2007-04-19 22:38:25 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I motorbike is so lots extra effective them strolling it extremely is approximately 35 energy according to mile mutually as strolling is approximately a hundred. start up out with an elementary 10 min heat up and then pedal at 70-ninety rpm in a kit it extremely is trouble-free. you opt to trip perplexing sufficient to get your respiratory to the factor the place you may communicate yet no longer sing. you opt to trip for no less than a hour. canines decide to run at 5-6 mph and it incredibly is a huge workout for them as nicely. enable them to set the p.c...

2016-10-28 12:54:56 · answer #8 · answered by Erika 4 · 0 0

walking burns more calories as you use more energy walking than cycling, cycling is more easier because once you get moving it takes less energy to keep moving

2007-04-19 22:48:52 · answer #9 · answered by dave n kez 4 · 0 0

cycling for 30 minutes can burn up to 600 calories i know i read it.

2007-04-19 22:35:05 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Cycling definatley

2007-04-19 22:46:58 · answer #11 · answered by Kevan M 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers