English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

In a story I'm writing, someone is accused of making prank calls. Do the police need this person's permission to pull his phone records?

2007-04-19 13:15:19 · 16 answers · asked by quayva 2 in Politics & Government Law Enforcement & Police

16 answers

They do not need a search warrant. They simply need a subpoena, which can be issued by the Prosecutor's Office without anything from a judge.

2007-04-19 13:34:39 · answer #1 · answered by Kevin 6 · 0 1

Get a No Cost Background Check Scan at https://bitly.im/aNK4R

Its a sensible way to start. The site allows you to do a no cost scan simply to find out if any sort of data is in existence. A smaller analysis is done without cost. To get a detailed report its a modest payment.

You may not realize how many good reasons there are to try and find out more about the people around you. After all, whether you're talking about new friends, employees, doctors, caretakers for elderly family members, or even significant others, you, as a citizen, have a right to know whether the people you surround yourself with are who they say they are. This goes double in any situation that involves your children, which not only includes teachers and babysitters, but also scout masters, little league coaches and others. Bottom line, if you want to find out more about someone, you should perform a background check.

2016-05-19 23:10:17 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

An administrative subpeona, signed by a prosecutor, is generally enough. However, the records that such a search produce generally only show toll calls that are billed. To get a record of local calls, the phone company has to set up a "trap and trace" which lists all calls, but requires a court order.

2007-04-19 14:15:59 · answer #3 · answered by Thomas R 2 · 0 0

To pull the records at the phone company, no.

To record a call the requiements depend upon state law. In some states only one party needs to consent. In others, both parties need to consent. With no consent, a court order is required.

2007-04-19 13:19:19 · answer #4 · answered by Bostonian In MO 7 · 0 0

Sure, go wild. We record you anyway, so if you believe like doing it then it will have to now not be a crisis. Nonetheless, if it gets in the way of the Officer doing his/her job (i.E. You filming him and asking him questions instead of responding to his instructional materials) then you might find your self being arrested. You must comply with cheap course throughout a traffic stop (i.E. Keep in the automobile, show your arms, etc.) i would most likely snicker should you pulled your flip phone out and started trying to video me on a visitors stop.

2016-08-11 01:41:00 · answer #5 · answered by pizzaro 4 · 0 0

NO! they only need a warrant to listen to the call with a tap. it is very easy for them to just get a list of outgoing/incoming phone #'s and time and length of the call and the names of the people on the phone co's records.

2007-04-19 13:24:55 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

According to Amendment 5 of the US Const: yes. They need permission from the court.

2007-04-19 13:18:27 · answer #7 · answered by ? 6 · 0 0

Wire tapping is a violation of law because it is intruding into the privacy of a person which is protected under the Constitution.

2007-04-19 13:18:46 · answer #8 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 0 0

Either permission, or a court order, or the evidence thus gathered will be inadmissible.

2007-04-20 03:39:32 · answer #9 · answered by WC 7 · 0 0

Yes, a judge would have to sign a warrant

2007-04-19 13:39:42 · answer #10 · answered by ? 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers