What are some positive points to teaching Creationism in Public Schools?

Question

Just needed some help in knowing. Thanks.

Nautical- This isn't homework. Thanks.

Answer 1

None. None at all. It is teaching religious doctrine and that should always been a private personal matter, not taught as fact.

Christians will say it's the "other side of the evolution coin" and should be taught alongside it, but that is not true. Evolution is a science and has facts, proven facts, to support it. Creation has the bible which cannot be proven to be factual.

ONLY facts should be taught in science. Study the bible in literature or comparative religion class, but not in science. And NEVER before grade 10.

Answer 2

There are none. The ludicrousness of trying to pass a religious belief off as science! One of the basic tenets of science education is the scientific method, and as Wikipedia states, the scientific method "is based on gathering observable, empirical, measurable evidence, subject to specific principles of reasoning." Darwin's theory of evolution can be studied and tested in such a manner, but creationism cannot because there is NO factual evidence to back it up. The fact that there needs to be a "debate" on this matter really blows my mind.

Answer 3

As far as I am concerned there are no positive points to teaching Creationism in public schools. That is part of religious doctrine and should be taught only in church school or the home. There is NO place for any kind of religion in any public school.

Answer 4

Honestly, I learned about phlogiston in chemistry class - it was just what we thought at one point and as long as it's presented at a dead theory or myth, it's fine. Nobody will let it lie at just that or try to present alternative myths to show that, yes, myths abound in the absence of knowledge. Teaching creationism (a modern form of an ancient creation myth) in school is like giving a pyromaniac a book of matches and a can of gas and aiming him at the paper warehouse. It's just a bad idea.

Thanks for asking.

Answer 5

I studied the Bible as a class in PRIVATE school. I actually believe it could be a good thing if done properly. That is my fear. That it will be presented in such a good light as to brainwash rather than merely inform. I take pride in the fact that I can go toe to toe with any preacher and they cannot get the better of me because I know my facts! For more discussion on this topic, please e-mail me.

Answer 6

Creationism is wonderful, for one thing you can explain how miracles were performed. Creationism is included in a larger branch of learning called church science. Also included are intelligent design and Godly Chemistry. I have heard it is possible to get a degree in Creationsim and I'm going to look into it.
I do know one thing though. God does not like Neanderthals or their fossils.
In reference to them, a preacher once quoted God as saying "This causeth me irkage."

Answer 7

there are none, creationism is a religion-specific belief, not actual fact. Schools are to teach children facts, if they HAD to teach creationism, then there should be a disclaimer attached to the lessons.


but seriously, there's no good points in teaching children a rumour based off of a repeatedly controversial source

Answer 8

I honestly see no value in teaching creationism at all, unless you're including mythologies from numerous religions and cultures. Then, it would be valuable in showing kids the various cultural and religious beliefs regarding how the universe and man came to be. But if they want to teach Christian only, I see it having no benefit other than to indoctrinate children into their religion.

Answer 9

i'm undecided that they meant that for the duration of straight forward terms christian creationism might desire to learn, yet i think of that each and each physique the creation thoughts might desire to a minimum of be reported with the main elementary components. you spot, whilst i grow to be at school, they reported that for constructive, the creation of life grow to be attributed to risk, and that i had a concern with the incontrovertible fact that this grow to be the only concept taught. there grow to be no point out in any respect of different theories, so i think of the colleges might desire to might desire to teach the fundamentals of all theories on the muse of life. it relatively is unlike they may be taking components, right here, in basic terms letting youngsters comprehend that there ARE different evaluations available. in spite of everything, we weren't there whilst it handed off, so how do all of us comprehend for constructive? I even have my own theory that asserts pangea grow to be the backyard of eden, and that the sin of adam and eve brought about the wear up of the backyard of eden(plate tectonics). oh yeah, and that i think of that a hundred,000,000 years is yet an afternoon to God. as an artist i will enable you comprehend, as quickly as I create some thing, it keeps on changing till i think like combating the creation technique(evolution)!

Answer 10

Positive points to teaching something fundamentally false in school? Hm. Comic relief, maybe. Let's see. You'll appease the bible-belt. Not too much else. That's a lot like teaching a Middle-Earth history class. And you know how hard it is to find Gondor on a map.