If the WW3 will happen, how many sides will there be in this war?

Question

In addition to this question, which countries will take place in these sides?

Answer 1

Unfortunately, WWIII will be global suicide, therefore in answer to your question, as long as there's rational superpowers who believe in MAD, there will be no WW3. By definition, the next world war wil be nuclear, how could it not. In a nuclear war there will be no winner. In a nuclear world, the only true enemy is war itself.

The next World War will involve a nuclear exchange, how could it not if both sides believe no price for victory will be too high. In the first 30 minutes, nearly a billion people will have been vaporised, mostly in the US, Russia, Europe, China and Japan. Another 1.5 billion will die shortly thereafter from radiation poisoning. The northern hemisphere will be plunged into prolonged agony and barbarity.

Eventually the nuclear winter will spread to the southern hemisphere and all plant life will die. You ask what country would be victorious, you are asking when will we commit global suicide. My answer is it won't happen soon because the larger superpowers are more rational than the rump states in the middle east.

While we hear talk of a nuclear-Iran or a confrontation with NorKor, little is said about the 2 bulls in the glass shop. The arsenals of Russia and the US are enough to destroy a million Hiroshimas. But there are fewer than 3000 cities on the Earth with populations of 100,000 or more. You cannot find anything like a million Hiroshimas to obliterate. Prime military and industrial targets that are far from cities are comparatively rare. Our biggest threat is from an accidental launch by the Russians.

At the point of global suicide, it doesn't matter who is on what side....where you go to hide, or how long you can survive. In a nuclear age like i said before, the only true enemy is war itself.

Answer 2

Nope. The manner the contemporary international is mounted, WW3 is close unattainable. Hell, part the sector would 'again' Iran, however finally, there is not anything to combat for. If Russia and China devote billions of bucks, lots of assets, political status, and the lives in their persons to a battle in aid of Iran, what do they have got to achieve? It is going vice versa. What might the US achieve from a battle with Iran? We're now not making some thing extra comfy, we are not getting some thing out of it. More than most probably, battle with Iran won't occur. Even if we do have interaction in hostilities with Iran, and any individual else joins the combat, essentially the most I can see taking place is a proxy battle that would possibly not unfold external of Iranian borders. All this battle with Iran speak is worry mongering at its best.

Answer 3

It will first start in the Middle East when we leave Iraq, the revenge that Iran has been vowing for 20 years will be theres when they attack them, and Syria and other Arab nations will stand by and let it happen. Israel and a couple of other arab nations will get us involved. Once we're in it, China will view this as an opportunity to try and weaken us militarily by supporting Iran, Europe is going to sit this one out. Then the idiot in Iran will make that fateful mistake of seending a nuclear weapon into Israel and WW III will have begun.

Answer 4

Probably 3.

The entire civilized world (including us)
The Middle-East wackos
And the rest of the "axis of evil": N. Korea, etc.

I don't think it's gonna happen, though

Answer 5

WW3 won't happen!
The nuclear stalemate makes sure.

Answer 6

i dont think there will be one because of nuclear weapons

Answer 7

the world is round... how many sides has a boll? jerk...

Answer 8

Two!

Right and wrong!

Hope it never comes...best wishes.

Answer 9

iran, iraq, UN, N korea...i think thats all of them