I mean one person so much damage. He had two pistols the two at Calobine had more firepower and did less damage then this nut. I think they really need to investagate this situation more closely.
2007-04-19 06:01:25 · 12 answers · asked by Good Grief 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Law Enforcement & Police
You can do some editing today with picture. And he went to the post office. What is up with this two hour gap did he go to get lunch too. I think he had some mental problems. They need to do better servanllience in the schools.
2007-04-19 06:56:37 · update #1
Well, lets wait and see what he was visiting online, but I do beleive he acted entirely alone for his own inner rampages against others never ceased and all attempts at speaking with him, or forging a friendship were REBUKED and REJECTED by him. He just hated and was evil.
Even if he blogged or such, nobody is responsible for his behavior but him. He was not innocent and premeditated, planned and acted out the sick evil in his mind against innocent people.
The 2 at columbine obviously werent filled with near as much hatred and evil then. They were evil nonetheless !!!
I tend to agree with F. Graham on this.
2007-04-19 08:05:49 · answer #1 · answered by fivefootnuttinhuny 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
He worked alone. He was obviously mentally ill. He did more damage probably because he was an adult, and thought it out more thoroughly than the two teenagers. He also had captive victims where the Columbine situation had people scattered and running and escaping.
Let's not add conspiracy theory to this already way too tragic event. people are already scared enough.
They are investigating very closely and as well as they can.
He WAS mentally ill. Mentally ill can also mean psychotic and/or criminally insane which he obviously was.. What sane rational human being would do this? Come on. Just because people are saying he was mentally ill does not mean he was not evil and murderous. You think murderers are completely rational and sane? come on now. What he did was not human. Something was severely wrong with this creep.
During the two hour gap he went to prepare the video and letters for NBC , then he went to the post office to mail them then he continued to the 2nd building.
2007-04-19 13:09:22 · answer #2 · answered by babygyrl_nyc 5 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Yes, he was alone. You should know that there was no one around to take out Cho. In a building with a lot of people he had several targets. Those pistols hold a big magazine. Also, you can change pistol magazines quickly.
2007-04-19 13:05:27 · answer #3 · answered by c1523456 6 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Holy crap, a new conspiracy theory?
VPI&SU has a student body of about 25,000. Columbine HS had how many students -- about 500? Perhaps the two kids at Columbine couldn't march into a lecture classroom with 100 students in it and open fire? And their plan included detonating a number of bombs which, fortunately, did not go off.
Yeah, one person with a pair of semiautomatic pistols can inflict that much carnage in an area which was specifically declared a "Gun-Free Zone", because he knew that there'd be nobody who could shoot back at him. He chained the building shut, and parked near the only exit to the classrooms, and could pick off targets at his leisure.
2007-04-19 13:13:11 · answer #4 · answered by Dave_Stark 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Yes, he was a psychotic mal-adjusted dipstick that took advantage of the unarmed.
Its has nothing to do with the NRA, it is the nature of the insane.
Oh, that Ax Ishmael crap---this is an attempt to convey some bastardized form of Islamic martyrdom. As well as an effort to establish a relationship to an Islamic value system.
2007-04-19 13:06:31 · answer #5 · answered by FunkyMcNasty 3 · 4⤊ 1⤋
One person can do so much damage because he was in a crazy state of mind and people were taken by surprise. People weren't expecting a mad man to come into the school and start shooting.
Cho had Ishmael acts on his wrist which I believe means that he considered himself a sacrafice to prove a point.
Ishamel was the son of Abraham. God told Abraham to sacrafice his son Ishmael (Issac) to see if Abraham was really loyal to him. My theory is that A. Ishmael on the packaging he sent to NBC is A: for Abraham and Ishmael for Issac. Perhaps Cho thinks he will be preserved by God for what he did?
2007-04-19 13:08:37 · answer #6 · answered by AmandaHugNKiss 4 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Is that a serious question? Why is it when people are shown facts they still try to find the answer when its staring them straight in the face?? And for that one jackass the NRA didn't pull the trigger you DIP, a disturbed mental nut ball did.....quit trying to balme others for the actions of a fruit loop.
2007-04-19 13:21:27 · answer #7 · answered by cal_gal_81 3 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Yes!.
2007-04-19 20:32:52 · answer #8 · answered by CGIV76 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Here come the conspiracy theorists. Where have you guys been?
2007-04-19 13:04:46 · answer #9 · answered by capu 5 · 4⤊ 1⤋
yes,it doesnt take long with a semi auto
2007-04-19 13:10:19 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋