English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Humans have created weapons that can destroy ourselves over and over again. Most of us believe in religions that cannot tolerate or accommodate other religions (without contradictions). Is 'nature' fed up with the human race? Are we going to become extinct because of us?

2007-04-19 03:15:18 · 9 answers · asked by whocrit 3 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

9 answers

Well, one thing I've learned is that evolution is not what alot of people think it is. It is not a progression to become a "higher being" but just adapting to the surroundings because that is what evolution is, to be more suitable to your surroundings.
On another note, a friend of mine has a theory that humans are very complex parasites, and as parasites, we are going to eventually destroy our "host" and move on to another one.

2007-04-19 03:26:25 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I have to agree with your statement.

Of all the animals (yes humans are animals) in the world only humans have the ability to totally destroy each other.

Some much for being a higher form of life.

2007-04-19 03:20:35 · answer #2 · answered by nycguy10002 7 · 1 0

No, morals and ethics did not evolve. Our ethical standards come from God All people nonetheless maintain clone of God upon them, even after the autumn of Adam and Eve into sin. clone of God grew to become into effaced on the autumn, even though it grew to become into not erased, and so guy nonetheless knows top and incorrect no count what number attempt to assert in any different case. Even atheists react to this inherent understanding of top and incorrect, some even to the quantity of residing exemplary lives.

2016-10-12 22:36:14 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Evolution means unrolling. The idea of cladistics is associated with it. This means that growth can be best represented by a diagram of binary nodes. Together with the injunction against "endless genealogies" in 1 Timothy 1:4, and the observation at 1 Corinthians 8:1 that knowledge puffs up, but love builds up, it seems that the dragnet of Habakkuk 1:15, 16 is analogous to the final state of affairs. When people get scared of the puffy effect of knowledge (such as know-it-all kids), they seem to use family entanglements to slow it all down so that the tree of generation doesn't keep getting bigger and bigger. You can imagine how difficult unrolling a dragnet is. You can't blame the kids though. They have such burdens put on them to save the day.

Where do the weapons come into it? Don't know, but there are additional factors. Hypnosis tends to induce right arm catalepsy. In fact it can induce whole body catalepsy. But it starts with the right arm. If somebody is suppressing their anger (typically this is when they're really offended but they've convinced themselves that so-and-so would be able to handle the situation even better, therefore applying a perfectionist interdependent ethic to sorting matters out aka shame-based culture), the blood flow in their brain changes, particularly in the left hemisphere and cerebellum. This is why catalepsy begins in the right arm. The cerebellum is responsible for matching up sensory input with muscle control information, so the person may be aware of what's happening but can't respond to it. At the end of the day, tournaments, debates, sports, music auditions etc. have been used to determine the "best" claim to appreciating the justice issues of humanity because it can be seen that being a good person by dealing with your responsibilities promptly and handing on matters that aren't your concern is good for your health, unless somebody kills you for it.

All is not lost. I think the flood of Noah's day was a metaphor (metaphors are more direct and deliberate than analogies because they utilise a well-kept brain free of base emotions kept in the subconscious, as metaphor means bearing the meaning of one word over to another, as opposed to merely heading in a proportionate direction; this relates to the workings of the mind as described by Baddeley's model of working memory) for what's described in Isaiah 5:30 "In that day they will roar over it like the roaring of the sea. And if one looks at the land, there is only darkness and distress; even the sun will be darkened by clouds." This refers to verse 26: "He lifts up a banner for the distant nations, he whistles for those at the ends of the earth. Here they come, swiftly and speedily!"

Therefore, I think that the Ark (meaning coffer for safeguarding) was a deathly symbol of what the genetic engineering efforts were doing to earth's resources (see references to "ruining the earth" and possibly doctors taking over pregnancies with or without occultic assistance in Genesis 6:4). Noah was able to manage the beasts because they're really not all that bad. Humans make them more vicious deliberately so that they can feel better about their own behaviour. I saw a TV show the other night where a man was teaching wolves how to be wild. What ??? Since when does a wolf cub need somebody biting their ear and howling for them so they can learn how to be a wolf? There were other wolves there anyway.

The name of Noah was comfort. Hebrew names often had signficance. In any event, the animals were safer with him in seemingly untenable conditions (I think it would have been something more like installation art considering I don't think the Flood really happened.) but maybe there were protest marches everywhere. Suddenly everybody had a common enemy - the one who looks after animals must be bad. How does this relate to enemies flooding over the landscape? Bedroom politics tend to turn into major international conflicts, depending on who's in which cult. Maybe they did parade Noah around a bit. I don't know. But I think the limits of stupid humans go as far as the sustainability of their right arm. Maybe slightly further, but it's not as bad as it looks, unless you happen to like picking on righteous people.

2007-04-20 00:12:35 · answer #4 · answered by Christian person 3 · 1 0

The problem with humans is that they have become smart enough to be able to destroy themselves, but not yet smart enough not to do it.

2007-04-19 15:39:18 · answer #5 · answered by Martin 5 · 0 0

oh, but believers say humans don't evolve, so we can't evolve to destroy ourselves! so, we're going to be fine.

unless you believe in facts, then yes, we'll blow ourselves up soon enough

2007-04-19 03:19:27 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Religious People cannot believe in Evolution - which is why things aren't getting any better...

2007-04-19 05:04:10 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Sure, look what happened to Atlantis ;-) (and yeah I do believe it could have existed)

2007-04-19 03:22:24 · answer #8 · answered by themaniccrafter 2 · 1 0

No, we will carry on making our planet a real shitehole.

2007-04-19 04:05:27 · answer #9 · answered by Jim 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers