---
You are forgetting that burning conventional hydrocarbons (gasoline) also produces water. So we're not talking about a big difference here.
*
However, here's what's missing from the public discussion of hydrogen fuel-cell cars: hydrogen (in the form available to us) is not a fuel. It is an energy carrier.
*
Hydrogen is a battery. Water + electricity = hydrogen. Then, in the fuel cell, Hydrogen makes water and electricity again. This is a reversible chemical process, exactly how a battery works! All the energy comes from electricity. The hydrogen 'carries' it.
*
A fuel-cell car is an electric car, with a fuel cell and hydrogen tank added on - so it will always be more expensive than a plain electric car. Furthermore, new battery research is now giving us electric vehicle batteries that can be charged in 10 minutes, with a 250,000 mile lifespan (see http://www.phoenixmotorcars.com )
*
Check out that link above, and tell me why that car needs a tank of hydrogen? Fuel cells are less than 50% efficient, while battery storage is close to 90% efficient.
*
The whole hydrogen idea has been popularized by the oil interests - so they'll still have something to sell to us when we're driving electric cars.
---
2007-04-21 03:52:33
·
answer #1
·
answered by apeweek 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
well to start with Hydrogen will have its effect on global warming, like it will help to reduce the co2 leaving into space/or it will stop much of unwanted bad air going from the car, because it will not going to give out pollution
it is future flue and it has great future with cars and many more house hold things and vehicles too run with.
thanks for the q
2007-04-19 01:29:12
·
answer #2
·
answered by sudhir a 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
There would technically be more water in a given (very, very local) area. But there is already a LOT and I mean a LOT!!! of water vapour everywhere so it would make no difference, even if every vehicle on Earth spontaneously became a hydrogen-powered one.
Beside, gasoline combustion also creates water vapour. Look at car exhaust on a cold day; there you see it.
2007-04-19 01:02:42
·
answer #3
·
answered by poorcocoboiboi 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
I might desire to admit that I smiled once I examine your question. this is thrilling cases, isn't it? seems to me that for the time of recent times you could blame each and every adventure or their intensity (whether severe or no longer) on worldwide Warming and function this beautiful much self-righteous tone the place you could on no account be shown incorrect. i might have an interest to work out if there is a few variety of evidence to teach whether there's a upward push in severe events or their intensity globally. Is there this form of ingredient? It feels like the outcomes may be incredibly confusing to collect.... besides, interior the previous, I consistently saved listening to stuff approximately how places (like Australia for example) might go through boiling warm temperatures, droughts, sea point rises and different issues. those have been the meant indicators that worldwide Warming is right here and it incredibly is merely going to worsen. After watching the present situation interior the worldwide, now it style of seems such as you could say freezing chilly temperatures, snow, floods, rain and especially lots each and every ingredient else is the fault of world Warming....
2016-12-26 14:50:36
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hydrogen is all around us, but you just don't open your gas tank and it flows in. It takes large amounts of energy like coal and nuclear to refine it. This still benefits urban areas because of the idle efficiency and smog reduction but is hardly a magic bullet. Oh and at around $100 a gallon and the whole Hindenberg incident you might not see it become so popular.
2007-04-19 01:10:26
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Not enough water to cause an appreciable difference. Still heat pollution, though, and CO2 at power plants, we must sequester the carbon to see results.
2007-04-19 01:02:49
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
they contaminate the earth less then the usual cars. healthier cars
2007-04-19 01:01:35
·
answer #7
·
answered by julianchis1223 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
Also they will produce more NO2 ,or photo smog.
2007-04-19 02:49:23
·
answer #8
·
answered by JOHNNIE B 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
It would have no effect.
2007-04-19 01:00:54
·
answer #9
·
answered by Always Right 7
·
1⤊
0⤋