Bombs kill too and hand grenades, so do rocket launchers and machetes and bazookas etc.. Lets' make them all legal along with guns since anything that kills is all the same (according to some people)
How people think that way is beyond me. It's saying if guns kill and so do cars and so do knives etc, then lets ban them all. Cars were designed for driving, planes flying, knives cutting food, baseball bats playing sport etc.. guns were designed for what?.... killing and that's it. So are bombs, so are hand grenades etc. There is a difference!
2007-04-18 22:57:47
·
answer #1
·
answered by RD 3
·
2⤊
1⤋
Black Ops in every way 1. The Story is WAY Better, but the multiplayer is bad, too repetitive, but Black Ops has some that save it for me, for instance, Wager Matches like One In The Chambe and Sticks and Stones and Gun Game. Nazi Zombies is one of the only reasons why I have the game, and if it didn't have it, I'd sell it in an instant. 2. Black Ops has an intense story, I mean, you could even fly in the helicopter! Epic! I liked the Boat Mission where you could listen to "Sympathy for the Devil" by Rolling Stones. The guns are also better, and the easter-egg Thundergun in the story just Packs-A-Punch... I mean, you can blow enemies away with it! 3. The weapons are unbalanced in MW2, like the Scar-H and the UMP45 and the ACR, and especially the Barret 50. Calibur... in Black Ops, the guns aren't any better, but at least they don't attempt and fail at the realistic feel to it. 4. The graphics may be better in Multiplayer, but that's all, the Campaign has better graphics. Zombies is equivalent to MW2's graphics 5. MW2 consists of people trying to go directly after nukes and end the game early, Black Ops removed that. Also, MW2 only held my interest for a brief time before I moved on to Bad Company 2, in which is my favorite FPS of all time 6. Drunk Russian Soviets 7. Nazi Zombies has a good background story, and the campaign has an intense story as well. Modern Warfare 2 is a disgrace to it's predecessor World at War and Modern Warfare 1. Black Ops is only better because of it's story and Gameplay in Campaign and Zombies, in MW2 the Multiplayer MIGHT be better, but I don't like it much.
2016-05-18 22:00:35
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
True. You can kill many more people with a gun at one time than any other weapon besides explosives. I don't know why people want to dispute this fact. I mean it's a fact whether you are for gun control or not.
2007-04-18 22:59:46
·
answer #3
·
answered by Turtle 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Except when Texas women run over cheating husbands, a single muslim in North Carolina decides that he is going to kill Americans, an old guy in California kill dozens, then there those that have the gall to drag people behind their vehicles to kill others. Then there was the guy that murdered my dad with a car. Ted Kennedy.
The lynchings in 1920 by the KKK,
The last murder in this town was with a knife.
Oh yeah Jack the Ripper, Ted Bundy,
This is nothing compared to the weaponry you will find in any penitentiary system anywhere in the world.
2007-04-18 23:57:53
·
answer #4
·
answered by .45 Peacemaker 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
Its not the weapons....the problem is the people doing the crimes that are sick in the head why don't we ban them huh..?.........
2007-04-18 22:29:29
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
I went to Arkansas and saw a saw that could outsaw any saw I ever saw, so if you go to Arkansas and see a saw that could outsaw the saw I saw, I'de like to see that saw saw.
That is what your post made me think of.
Doodad
2007-04-18 22:39:06
·
answer #6
·
answered by doodad 5
·
1⤊
4⤋