Oliver Cromwell. He seized power in the 1600s, and while from an upper class family, his family did not hold a royal title.
2007-04-18 21:05:47
·
answer #1
·
answered by ebrim@swbell.net 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
~If by "sat on England's throne" you mean held monarchial title, then by definition there was none. Once a king or queen is crowned, he or she is of royalty as a simple matter of logic. If you are speaking of wayward tourists who snuck a squat on the royal chair, I am sure there was more than one but my brother's wife's cousin did that back in '73.
2007-04-18 21:08:24
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Actually ....
There were more. The Danes were not actual royalty in the classic sense of the word.
Oliver and Richard Cromwell were not royalty either.
But then again...they did not claim to be ON the throne... so...
2007-04-18 21:01:44
·
answer #3
·
answered by Puppy Zwolle 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
My first guess is William the Conqueror who came from Normandy and took the crown by force in 1066.
2007-04-18 20:56:50
·
answer #4
·
answered by Come on in, the water's lovely 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
properly i think of they might evaluate them to be socially equivalent as their is an exceptionally sturdy probability that they are blood appropriate! case in point a relative of the ex greek monarchy is the present Queen consort for Spain.
2016-10-12 22:14:25
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
John Goodman. I saw it in a movie so it's true.
Just like '300.' LOL
2007-04-19 03:54:19
·
answer #6
·
answered by retropink 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
is actually sitting without formal coronation is what you mean?????? well theres a lot.
2007-04-18 20:58:09
·
answer #7
·
answered by micalovadinnerdevanne 2
·
0⤊
0⤋